> "JN" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So I've removed /etc/alternatives/gs and linked it to
>> /usr/bin/gs-afpl, and we'll see what happens now.
JN> Ok.
Here's what happened. Now what? It isn't at all clear that this has
anything to do with the gs version
Op vr, 15-04-2005 te 11:22 +0100, schreef Bernard Hurley:
>
> When called from lilypond-book, LilyPond does _not_ take care of
> formatting the pages. This is precisely the reason I started using it.
> So that I can have a multi-movement score with fancy headers, table of
> contents, etc. What it
Laura Conrad wrote:
> Getting latex to not render a footnote marker is pretty easy. You
> just say:
>
> \footnotetext[1]{Here's the first footnote.}
Of course, I've been away from LaTeX for too long!
The sort of thing I had in mind was to get lilypond-book to (optionally)
produce a La
> > \includegraphics.
>
> Yes, I agree. Go forth and provide a patch!
>
>
> Werner
Will do -as soon as I have convinced myself I havn't broken anything!
/Bernard
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Laura Conrad writes:
> [adieu]# ls -l /etc/alternatives/gs
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Apr 15 10:03 /etc/alternatives/gs ->
> /usr/bin/gs-esp
> I don't know how this is supposed to work, but it seems unlikely that
> what's happening is what I want.
See man update-alternatives
> chugging. Most
> "JN" == Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JN> Laura Conrad writes:
>> 7.07.1 is not actually true -- when I "apt-get install gs" I get:
>>
>> [lilypond-2.5.19]# dpkg -l gs
>> ii gs 8.01-5 Transitional package
JN> Are you sure you don
Laura Conrad writes:
> 7.07.1 is not actually true -- when I "apt-get install gs" I get:
>
> [lilypond-2.5.19]# dpkg -l gs
> ii gs 8.01-5 Transitional package
Are you sure you don't have gs-esp or gs-gpl installed?
Try gs --version and/or dpkg -l | grep ' gs'.
Does 8.01 work
> "BH" == Bernard Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BH> To do it now you would have to get LaTeX to associate a
BH> footnote with a particular eps file but stop it rendering the
BH> footnote marker. If no one else wants to I will look into
BH> this!
Getting latex to not rende
> I would appreciate if I in latex could get the first and last \piece,
> \mark number, and bar number on a page to be able to put it in page
> headers/footers, or add some footnotes from within the music,
> as some editors do.
>
These are things I would like to be able to do(especially the
foot
> On Friday 15 April 2005 10.56, Karl Hammar wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > It also changes the numbering of all subsequent bars. I don't know the
> > > author's intent in this case (I didn't write that snippet), but I guess
> > > it could be something like an attaca movement.
> >
> > Yes. Th
...
> > Its not a matter circumventing any limitations of Lilypond, but of being
> > able to use the full power of LaTeX. It would not be practical to add
> > anything to LilyPond itself to get this functionality as using it would
> > involve (at least) two calls to lilypond. Actually I already hav
> >*No*, the forget does not work for:
> act 1, aria 13, bar 6 Violin II: the b is shown with natural
> act 1, aria 13, bar 11 Violin I: the f is shown with natural
> Elsewhere yes, but not for theese two notes.>
>
> When I print out Score13, neither of these errors are present, even if I add
*No*, the forget does not work for:
act 1, aria 13, bar 6 Violin II: the b is shown with natural
act 1, aria 13, bar 11 Violin I: the f is shown with natural
Elsewhere yes, but not for theese two notes.>
When I print out Score13, neither of these errors are present, even if I add
the line:
#(se
I think we want Lilypond to continue to follow standard practive. If we give
users the ability to violate those rules then total novices will start
making mistakes.
I think you know that in the example you gave, a person reading the score
would just play an f sharp where you want an f natural if yo
I'm attempting to build 2.5.19 on debian unstable. Configure seems to
be reasonably happy now, but is still complaining about gs:
WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs: /usr/bin/gs >= 8.15
(installed: 7.07.1)
7.07.1 is not actually true -- when I "apt-get install gs" I get:
[
> > > Isn't his what \makeatother is for?
> >
> > This isn't defined for plain TeX.
> >
>
> But lilypond-book produces a LaTeX document, not a TeX document.
Right. Sorry. IMHO this line should be deleted from lilypond-book.
> For example in 2.5.19 the code:
>
> \input lily-1105931465-system
Bernard Hurley wrote:
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I don't realize what you would want to add between the staff lines.
Is it to circumvent some limitations in LilyPond? Otherwise you could
just as well tell LilyPond to add the information.
I think both me, Werner and others on the mailing list would fin
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I don't realize what you would want to add between the staff lines.
> Is it to circumvent some limitations in LilyPond? Otherwise you could
> just as well tell LilyPond to add the information.
> I think both me, Werner and others on the mailing list would find it
> easier t
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 11:36 +0200, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Just wondering: is there anyone else from this list except me going to the
> Linux Audio Conference in Karlsruhe/Germany?
>
Jan & I will be there from friday noon to sunday morning.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lily
Bernard Hurley wrote:
When called from lilypond-book, LilyPond does _not_ take care of
formatting the pages. This is precisely the reason I started using it.
So that I can have a multi-movement score with fancy headers, table of
contents, etc. What it does is to break a long score up into several
On Friday 15 April 2005 10.56, Karl Hammar wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > It also changes the numbering of all subsequent bars. I don't know the
> > author's intent in this case (I didn't write that snippet), but I guess
> > it could be something like an attaca movement.
>
> Yes. The bigger pictur
Hi!
Just wondering: is there anyone else from this list except me going to the
Linux Audio Conference in Karlsruhe/Germany?
Greetings,
Jürgen
Citation from Linux Audio Developers List:
--
From: Frank Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Apr 12 2005 - 04:2
IIRC, volume is controlled on per-note basis (attack and release; passed
as value parameter to each note on/off command), such that this approach
would not impose any problems. However, almost all other parameters, such
as pitch bend (important for tuning of micro tones), are channel messages,
> > > It `normalises' the `@' character, so it no longer is of type
> > > `letter'. I also wonder why it's here. Additionally, it should
> > > be
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > to make TeX stop parsing after the `2'.
> > >
> >
> > Isn't his what \makeatother is for?
>
> This isn
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 00:55 -0700, Matthias Neeracher wrote:
> [Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
> I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
> keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
>
> On MacOS X, it seems that the symbols for x:maj7
Stephen wrote:
Note also that these bugs have low priority among developers, since
there are
plans to rewrite the midi system from scratch.>
My comments can be taken two ways, as suggestions for a rewrite of
span-dynamic-performer.cc or as a wish-list for the new implementation.
If I where to c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 21.31, Stephen wrote:
...
> > In the example, '\set Score.currentBarNumber = #1' creates the problem. I
Correct.
> > don't see why the numbering is reset there other than to remove the number
> > from that bar because it collides with the mark "D".
I forgot to say: The way LilyPond is designed today, you can only have
one MIDI instrument within each MIDI track, which means that the
solution I propose below will work for a PianoStaff but if you try the
same trick on a GrandStaff containing several staves with different
instruments, then your M
[Since we seem to be moving towards a release candidate, I thought
I'd repost this bug report. This is the one issue that currently
keeps my on 2.4.x for my personal needs.]
On MacOS X, it seems that the symbols for x:maj7 and x:m7.5- still
don't work properly in 2.5.19 (The former is omitte
29 matches
Mail list logo
