Apparently, I'm not quite there yet. Using lilypond 2.4.5 works, but
the output text is jagged bitmaps, not smooth Postscript fonts. The
feta fonts are fine; it's just lyrics that are jagged.
Using the various tricks (dvips -Ppdf -u+lilypond.map
-u+ec-mftrace.map) don't change the output, excep
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > in the mapping file.
> > dvips: Font Emmentaler-20 used in file lily-1066301946-1.eps is not in
> > the mapping file.
> >
> > I think that's closely related to mftrace naming fonts.
>
> > Because the mapfile contains files like this: emmentaler-20
> > emmentaler-20
2. I find that fonts are not embedded in PDF output, but everything is
drawn as lineart. Is this OK?
I'm not sure what you mean.
I mean that there are no embedded fonts in the PDF, letters and symbols
are drawn as curves. Is it intentional, or a ghostscript limitation or a
bug?
Yes, t
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> OK, I tried latest CVS.
> It seem to work, but there are issues to solve:
>
> 1. In build log:
> checking for shared libkpathsea... wc: conftest: No such file or directory
> no
>
> Where should conftest be?
In the build directory. From my config.log:
configure:7760:
Citerar Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 17 March 2005 10.38, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > > I think the difference also is, that we now use the database rather than
> > > the mailing list when looking at bugs.
> >
> > Yes, but it seems that Han-Wen and Jan fix lots of problems long b
On Thursday 17 March 2005 10.38, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > I think the difference also is, that we now use the database rather than
> > the mailing list when looking at bugs.
>
> Yes, but it seems that Han-Wen and Jan fix lots of problems long before
> you have had the time to even include them in
I'm about to look at Lilypond 2.5.x on SuSE 9.2.
I note the prerequisites include pango 1.6 or higher - any experience or
concerns about using the latest version, pango 1.8.1, that could save me
frustration in getting that set up? Or should I stick with 1.6.x
TIA
/Hans
--
Proud user of Lily
I am running OpenBSD 3.3, which is too out of date for the development
efforts of Matt Jibson and Matthias Kilian. Therefore, I decided to
take on the task of updating all the required packages on my system,
and build lilypond myself.
Using gcc 3.4.3, and fairly recent versions of every required
OK, I tried latest CVS.
It seem to work, but there are issues to solve:
1. In build log:
checking for shared libkpathsea... wc: conftest: No such file or directory
no
Where should conftest be? Any other thing to do to make this shared
library usage work?
2. I find that fonts are not embedded in P
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yes, that RemoveEmptyStaffContext is a replacement only for the ordinary
> Staff context, not for any other kind of contexts. If you use a recent
> 2.5.xx version, then there is a predefined
> \RemoveEmptyRhythmicStaffContext in earlier LilyPond version
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Némo writes:
>> Evince, the best pdf viewer for gnome, projet to be able to use it.
>> http://www.gnome.org/projects/evince/
>
> And this best pdf viewer for gnome does not ship with Debian?
it does. it's in testing and sid.
Pedro
Némo writes:
> I've just discover this compression format and it's great, realy beter
> than pdf
Duh. It replaces fonts with bitmaps of the characters that are
actually used.
> Evince, the best pdf viewer for gnome, projet to be able to use it.
> http://www.gnome.org/projects/evince/
And this
I've just discover this compression format and it's great, realy beter
than pdf (don't know about printing capabilities, the site is in
english, and as you can read it's not an easy language for me...) but it
would be great to think about adding it to lilypond.
http://www.djvuzone.org/wid/index
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 15 March 2005 13.39, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Han-Wen,
Another of all these quick bug fixes! Thanks for your hard work!
It would be great if you (and others who fix bugs in CVS) could also
send a reply to the original bug report that the problem has been fixed.
I s
Pedro Kröger wrote:
The subject says all. in this example the 1st staff should be hidden in
the second system like the 3rd staff. am I missing something?
Yes, that RemoveEmptyStaffContext is a replacement only for the ordinary
Staff context, not for any other kind of contexts. If you use a recent
15 matches
Mail list logo
