On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> > + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> > + (cd $(local_lilypond_dat
Matthias Kilian writes:
> # teTeX-2.0.x compatibility.
> local-install:
> - -$(INSTALL) -d $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> - (cd $(DESTDIR)$(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips && ln -sf ../fonts/map .)
> + -$(INSTALL) -d $(local_lilypond_datadir)/dvips
> + (cd $(local_lily
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 10:54:58PM +0100, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
> for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Sorry, I'm probably a little bit too drunk ;-) here are the patches.
$OpenBSD$
--- mf/GNUmakefile.orig Sat Feb 12 13:04:41 2005
+++ mf/G
Hi,
could anyone check wether the attached diffs are sane? I need them
for Matt's OpenBSD ports.
Ciao,
Kili
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Hi, Pál!
I am sorry for responding so late: last week not only I was in bad health,
but also my (quite old) linux installation, which finally broke down, such
that I had to install a new distribution. I am still working on getting
things running again, but I am quite confident that I will be ab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Why is it that the latest copy of the VERSION file in the
> lilypond_2_4 branch still contains
> PATCH_LEVEL=3
> instead of
> PATCH_LEVEL=5
>
> Is it related to the other problems mentioned on the mailing list?
yes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Why is it that the latest copy of the VERSION file in the
lilypond_2_4 branch still contains
PATCH_LEVEL=3
instead of
PATCH_LEVEL=5
Is it related to the other problems mentioned on the mailing list?
/Mats
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
2.4.5 is out. This release
* backports the tieWaitForNote featuer
> just wondering, why do OTF fonts return null for
> FT_Get_Postscript_Name()?. If I understand correctly, CFF files
> only contain the outlines, but OTF has everything, doesn't it?
Hmm, probably you are doing something wrong. Testing with
emmentaler11.otf from version 2.5.9 (the latest lilypon
