So should I put these changes to 2.4.4 source files?
No, they are already in 2.4-CVS (or you may try the pathes below). Do
something like:
cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/lilypond co -rlilypond_2_4 -d
lilypond-2.4 lilypond
I'm not sure if/when 2.4.4 will happen, CVS is still at 2.
Abel Cheung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 2005-02-07(Mon) 15:12:31 -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>> On 7-Feb-05, at 4:27 AM, Abel Cheung wrote:
>> >2. And a more serious problem -- will lilypond support using DESTDIR
>> >for
>> > staged installation (i.e. install in another root dir)? Th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Abel Cheung writes:
>
> > 1. lilypond can't bootstrap -- it tries to search for .scm files in
> >system location. This problem has been reported by others before
> >but not patched in 2.5.11 yet. Patch is attached (again) with this mail.
>
> Thanks. This is fo
Abel Cheung writes:
> 1. lilypond can't bootstrap -- it tries to search for .scm files in
>system location. This problem has been reported by others before
>but not patched in 2.5.11 yet. Patch is attached (again) with this mail.
Thanks. This is for --srcdir build, I presume? Does the p
Graham Percival writes:
> spark:~ gperciva$ echo 20050117 | gawk '{printf "%ld\n",
> $1*100}'
> 2.00501e+13
> spark:~ gperciva$ gawk --version
> GNU Awk 3.1.2
> I guess this explains it.
Yes, thanks. I've added a fix to CVS, using float should work, also with mawk.
echo 20100117 |
On 2005-02-07(Mon) 15:12:31 -0800, Graham Percival wrote:
>
> On 7-Feb-05, at 4:27 AM, Abel Cheung wrote:
> >2. And a more serious problem -- will lilypond support using DESTDIR
> >for
> > staged installation (i.e. install in another root dir)? This is very
> > common for packaging, say:
>
>
I just noticed that all the lilypond examples in the pdf manual are
centered. Is this deliberate? It occurred between 2.5.9 and 2.5.11.
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On 7-Feb-05, at 4:27 AM, Abel Cheung wrote:
2. And a more serious problem -- will lilypond support using DESTDIR
for
staged installation (i.e. install in another root dir)? This is very
common for packaging, say:
Is DESTDIR another name for --prefix ? I can very easily have
lilypond install
On 7-Feb-05, at 12:17 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
./configure: line 8126: test: 2.00501e+13: integer expression
expected
What does fontforge --version say, exactly?
fontforge 20050117
What version of awk do you use? Can you try these commands?
echo 20050117 | gawk '{p
Oops. I found that the latin1.enc problem is not coming from tetex,
because putting the previous tetex version back has the same failure.
I'll try to find the problem.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 2. By what nomenclature does one select text fonts using the postscript
> backend?
>Where does lilypond (or pango?) look for these font files?
It is done through Pango (which uses FontConfig). Lilypond uses the
same fonts as GNOME and other Gtk apps.
> Must these
> > On the fontforge discussion list George has already been asked to
> > provide such libraries, but this doesn't have top priority, AFAIK.
> > You might push him again.
>
> Hmm. And suppose that we asked, and he agreed, how long would it
> take before we have a working, installable font library?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> OK, I've tried and succeeded. Now I have dash-fraction and dash-period
> working for dashed slurs. Should my patches be created for the latest
> CVS? That would be problematic for me, because I've developed for my
> working 2.4.2 version. Or could I send patches for 2
Graham Percival writes:
>>> ./configure: line 8126: test: 2.00501e+13: integer expression expected
>>
>> What does fontforge --version say, exactly?
>
> fontforge 20050117
What version of awk do you use? Can you try these commands?
echo 20050117 | gawk '{printf "%d\n", $1*100}'
echo
Hello all --
First, the background:
I am creating sheet music for a project that requires that titling and
lyric text be set in Times (or a Times lookalike). Using lilypond 2.5.8,
I was able to use the ptmr font when invoking lilypond -b tex. However,
since version 2.5.10 (possibly also 2.5.9)
On 7-Feb-05, at 12:06 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
checking for fontforge... fontforge
checking for fontforge... /sw/bin/fontforge
checking /sw/bin/fontforge version... 20050117
./configure: line 8126: test: 2.00501e+13: integer expression expected
What does fontforge --vers
On 6-Feb-05, at 2:15 PM, Erik Sandberg wrote:
Could you add an explicit remark that percent repeats must be done
within a
Voice context?
Ok. Just percent repeats, and not other types? If so, done.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilyp
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Building 2.4.4 gave the same failure. I suppose we want current
> stable lilypond to work with tetex-3.0, don't we?
That is not important, we can assume that people who upgrade tetex
also upgrade lilypond. I will not be uploading tetex-3.0 before
a new lilypond package
Building 2.4.4 gave the same failure. I suppose we want current stable
lilypond to work with tetex-3.0, don't we?
So should I put these changes to 2.4.4 source files?
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailm
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Running lilypond-2.4.2 with tetex 2.99.7:
Is it really 2.4.2 you are using?
2.4.2 does not have all tetex-3.0 fixes, such as
2005-01-03 Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport teTeX-3.0 compatibility.
* SConstruct:
*
Hi,
I just finished uploading it to Mandrakelinux repository, which means it
should be available (as a contribute package) in 10.2 version. A lot of
people helped during making the packages.
However some problem exists during packaging:
1. lilypond can't bootstrap -- it tries to search for .scm
OK, I've tried and succeeded. Now I have dash-fraction and dash-period
working for dashed slurs. Should my patches be created for the latest
CVS? That would be problematic for me, because I've developed for my
working 2.4.2 version. Or could I send patches for 2.4.2 CVS and you
merge them into
Thanks for suggesting looking at texmf.cnf
I've found the following:
TEXMFMAIN = /usr/share/texmf
TEXMFCONFIG = $TEXMFMAIN
% - make sure that $TEXMFVAR precedes $TEXMFMAIN in the TEXMF definition.
TEXMF =
{!!$TEXMFCONFIG,!!$TEXMFVAR,!!$TEXMFMAIN,$TEXMFHOME,!!$TEXMFLOCAL,!!$TEXMFDIST}
As you ca
Another problem.
Running lilypond-2.4.2 with tetex 2.99.7:
warning: lily-guile: can't find "latin1.enc"
Backtrace:
In /usr/share/lilypond/2.4.2/scm/page-layout.scm:
91: 24 (let* (# # # #) (if # #) head-stencil)
96: 25* (if (procedure? header-proc) (header-proc layout scopes number
last?) #f)
9
Hi,
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
> I've found the problem, but I'm still not sure in solution:
> there is an mf.base file in
> /usr/share/texmf/web2c
>
> But texconfig creates its formats in
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c
What's in your texmf.cnf? (It typically resides in /etc or /etc/texmf
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> I've found the problem, but I'm still not sure in solution:
> there is an mf.base file in
> /usr/share/texmf/web2c
That's strange.
> But texconfig creates its formats in
> /var/lib/texmf/web2c
That's correct.
> So mf looks at the wrong place for mf.base
Can you find o
I've found the problem, but I'm still not sure in solution:
there is an mf.base file in
/usr/share/texmf/web2c
But texconfig creates its formats in
/var/lib/texmf/web2c
So mf looks at the wrong place for mf.base
Shouldn't mf.base and the other format files generated into
/usr/share/texmf/web2c?
B
Bertalan Fodor writes:
> Applied. Still the same error message with:
>
> mf-nowin -progname=mf asdf
> mf asdf
Hmm. Then the mf format has not been built or cannot be found. Try
building all formats by doing
texconfig init
mktexlsr
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU Li
Dirk Jagdmann writes:
> As the name of this script induces, it fixes compilation for gcc 3.1
> but it not working with gcc >= 3.3.
>
> You're right, that these problems should eventually be fixed by the
> flex developers,
This has little to do with flex development and has long been fixed.
The pr
Graham Percival writes:
> Lily CVS (slightly newer than 2.5.11), OSX 10.3.7, Matthias'
> experimental fink. I'm not certain if this is causing any problems.
> This may be a porting issue.
>
> ...
> checking for fontforge... fontforge
> checking for fontforge... /sw/bin/fontforge
> checking /sw/bi
30 matches
Mail list logo
