CVS 2004-12-29 22:58 compilation error

2005-01-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I get this error: > > In file included from all-font-metrics.cc:9: > include/all-font-metrics.hh:18:25: > warning: pango/pango.h: No such file or directory > include/all-font-metrics.hh:19:28: > warning: pango/pangoft2.h: No such file or directory > >

Re: utf8 vs. latin1

2005-01-01 Thread Chris Sawer
On 1 Jan 2005, at 15:22, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I thought that you had once told me that that Latin1 is a subset of UTF-8. This is not correct. One has to be careful to distinguish between a character set (ASCII / Latin1 / Unicode) and a mapping (encoding) used to represent text written using a

UTF8 and (La)TeX backend?

2005-01-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Hi werner, > > how do you think we should handle encoding for the TeX backend? I am > tempted to just dump > > \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} > > but as far as I've understood > (http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2004-04/msg0.html) the UTF8 > support for LaTeX

UTF8 and (La)TeX backend?

2005-01-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi werner, how do you think we should handle encoding for the TeX backend? I am tempted to just dump \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} but as far as I've understood (http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2004-04/msg0.html) the UTF8 support for LaTeX has only been available for a year or so, so it

utf8 vs. latin1

2005-01-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Hi Werner, I thought that you had once told me that that Latin1 is a subset of UTF-8. However, when I save a file as Latin1 and UTF8 under emacs, then the results differ, and latin1 chars are also saved as double bytes. Am I missing something? Did you mean that Latin1 is a subset of Unicode? Or