> > Below is `lilymetrics.tex', which works with both TeX and LaTeX.
> > Please test and comment.
>
> BTW, I suspect that Aaron would be interested in using this. Does
> this also work with hebrew TeX? (which is RTL IIRC)
AFAIK, even for r2l scripts the width of a box is always
non-negative. So
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> As can be seen, even paragraphs can be handled.
>
> The output format looks like this:
>
> (1 . (240 96.10254 5.35951))
> (2 . (4.99878 6.4151 0))
> (3 . (0 0 0))
> (4 . (13.33008 6.8872 0))
>
> Below is `lilymetrics.tex', which works with both TeX and LaTe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I've put the first component of TeX generated text metrics in place
> > [...]
> >
> > as you can see, I used a lispish format for now. The format is :
> >
> > (FONT-NAME MAGNIFICATION TEXT)
>
> After some investigation I found out that you have to do ugly hacks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I've put the first component of TeX generated text metrics in place
> > [...]
> >
> > as you can see, I used a lispish format for now. The format is :
> >
> > (FONT-NAME MAGNIFICATION TEXT)
>
> After some investigation I found out that you have to do ugly hacks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > However, I suppose we will still need some glue scripting, though.
>
> What do you mean with `glue scripting'?
We need some code to get our glyphnames into the PFA, don't we?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Alle 15:54, lunedì 27 dicembre 2004, Werner LEMBERG ha scritto:
> > Is there any disadvantage to using #'tag for large-scale works?
> > (speed reduction, or some complex formatting things not being
> > processed through #'tag)
>
> AFAIK, no.
>
> > It occurred to me that #'tag can be useful in extra
> Is there any disadvantage to using #'tag for large-scale works?
> (speed reduction, or some complex formatting things not being
> processed through #'tag)
AFAIK, no.
> It occurred to me that #'tag can be useful in extracting parts. If
> we've defined the obvious things, then we could organize
