--- Begin Message ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > BTW,
> >
> > I wouldn't mind of demanding that users write
> >
> > \line
> >
> > explicitly inside \column to go to horizontal mode again.
>
> Do you mean that
>
> \markup \column { { a b } {
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> What's the syntax of the s/u/d? Should it always be the first character
> in the glyph name? In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:
>
> fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")
>
> (i.e. "s" as first character before duration),
>
> but also:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> The vertical line of the current G clef is slightly bent (as in 19th
> century prints, AFAIK), while it was almost straight (as in modern prints)
> in former versions of lily.
That's an oversight. Anybody willing to rerender said piece to use the
bent clef?
--
H
Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW,
>
> I wouldn't mind of demanding that users write
>
> \line
>
> explicitly inside \column to go to horizontal mode again.
Do you mean that
\markup \column { { a b } { c d } }
=>
\markup \column { a b c d }
ie { } without command befor
Hi guys.
Thanks for the tip. I missed that one. However, I did not solve the problem.
What helped was to replace the line
\context GrandStaff <<
by
<<
So, I post the question here again, because I don't know if this is a bug or
just caused because it just happened to work in an old versio
What's the syntax of the s/u/d? Should it always be the first character
in the glyph name? In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:
fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")
(i.e. "s" as first character before duration),
but also:
fet_beginchar("Half Crossed notehead", "1sc
On Sunday 04 July 2004 10.58, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Pedro Kroger writes:
> > sh guile-gnome.sh now runs fine and compile ok. But, what am I
> > supposed to do next?
>
> Great. You should tell LilyPond (ie, GUILE and the dynamic loader)
> about all this stuff you compiled (see output-gnome.scm
The vertical line of the current G clef is slightly bent (as in 19th
century prints, AFAIK), while it was almost straight (as in modern prints)
in former versions of lily.
Greetings,
Jürgen
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> I can't see any difference compared to the default G clef
I can't see any difference compared to the default G clef in LilyPond.
Assuming that you mean the example
http://lilypond.org/web/images/fuga-fragment.png
/Mats
J L wrote:
Hi,
Did LilyPond use to use the G Clef found on the About page of
www.lilypond.org? If so, is it possible to have it reinst