On Wednesday 17 November 2004 18.02, Juergen Reuter wrote:
...
> * Whenever an editing command on the command line is executed, the
> musical contents changes, i.e. the gnome canvas may need to be updated.
> In the very first approach, you would completely execute everything
> starting with l
On Wednesday 17 November 2004 21.10, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > > - the most important feature for professional Windoze users, the killer
> > > feature so to say, would be a competent payed-for support. This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>> > * Make {} represent real lists in markup, and transform \markup {
> >>> > a b \bold { c d } e } in
> >>> >
> >>> > \markup \formatline { a b \bold c \bold d e }
> >>>
> >>> I'm starting to understand a couple of thing
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>> > * Make {} represent real lists in markup, and transform \markup {
>>> > a b \bold { c d } e } in
>>> >
>>> > \markup \formatline { a b \bold c \bold d e }
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > - the most important feature for professional Windoze users, the killer
> > feature so to say, would be a competent payed-for support. This is what
> > makes the difference between a good open source program and a su
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> - the most important feature for professional Windoze users, the killer
> feature so to say, would be a competent payed-for support. This is what
> makes the difference between a good open source program and a successful
> good open source program.
Do you have any concr
The file lilypond-book.itely is now up to date.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ralph Little wrote:
> ...
> However, I wholeheartedly agree with your assertion that the biggest
> bridge to cross is the non-mousey nature of the software, which is
> doubly large for non-techy musicians that have not encountered
> programming work. This could be tackled by
Now when you can simply double-click on a file to process it, most
windows users will only need to open the cygwin command window when
they have upgraded LilyPond and have to run convert-ly.
I know that feature requests shouldn't go to this mailing thread, but
how about adding an option in the rig
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Really? I've experienced many Windows programs that are much more
> tricky to install than cygwin.
Do not underestimate the importance of a friendly dog telling you that the
installer needs just a few more informations from you, like date of
birth
Hi,
I agree with all of that.
When I said that I found Cygwin installation clunky, I actually didn't
find it a big problem.
Being a programmer, I shouldn't really ;)
It just seems to me that any "perceived" barrier to installation ease
should be reduced to encourage more general acceptance of the
Ralph Little wrote:
Hi,
Undeniably the mass market at the moment would look to be using Windoze
as a platform.
If we could see an end to dependance on Cygwin, that would (partly) open
the door to mass acceptance of Lilypond by the general public.
Certainly if, as Erik says it could be boxed up for
Hi,
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ralph Little wrote:
> Certainly if, as Erik says it could be boxed up for one-step
> installation so that the Cygwin layer were packaged up with it, novice
> users would find it more acceptable.
There is a way to package cygwin on a CD and preselecting packages by
modify
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> there were some good intentions, but not much has happened.
Apart from Carl Sorensen, who started a programming concepts document
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-10/msg00241.html
which is not the same thing, but it's related.
Jan.
--
Jan
Andreas Scherer writes:
> Has anyone considered to apply Doxygen to the LilyPond sources?
See these threads
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-03/msg00226.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-04/msg00083.html
there were some good intentions, but not
Hi,
Undeniably the mass market at the moment would look to be using Windoze
as a platform.
If we could see an end to dependance on Cygwin, that would (partly) open
the door to mass acceptance of Lilypond by the general public.
Certainly if, as Erik says it could be boxed up for one-step
installatio
16 matches
Mail list logo
