I've now updated the section on lilypond-book options in the info
manual to be in sync with the actual implementation.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
I've been exploring the architecture of the FretDiagrams context.
One thing I think is really important to do is to have the FretDiagrams
music expression be the same as the ChordNames music expression. That
way the user doesn't have to try to synchronize two different sets of
chord definitions.
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 00:20:34 +0100 (CET), Juergen Reuter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I understand you correctly, you want to add a new articulation script
(rather than patching the code for dynamic marks). That's quite easy, if
you are a little bit familiar with metafont. For that purpose, yo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > > Unfortunately, the `glyphshow' operator is a level-2 PostScript
> > > command which older printers don't support (my original Apple
> > > LaserWriter Select is one of them).
> >
> > Is that really a problem?
>
> I think yes. Even Acrobat still produces level1 PS
> > Unfortunately, the `glyphshow' operator is a level-2 PostScript
> > command which older printers don't support (my original Apple
> > LaserWriter Select is one of them).
>
> Is that really a problem?
I think yes. Even Acrobat still produces level1 PS code on demand.
> Can't ghostscript be u
