Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Karl Hammar writes: >> > 2 I have no ecb.mf file installed: >> > $ locate ec/ecb | grep /usr >> >> It's part of the ec-fonts package > > Wich ec-fonts package ? Sorry. It is in LilyPond's sauter-fonts-mftraced CVS module, but by oversight it was not shipped in the ec-fonts-mfraced source tarb

Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-11 Thread Karl Hammar
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Karl Hammar writes: ... > > 2 I have no ecb.mf file installed: > > $ locate ec/ecb | grep /usr > > It's part of the ec-fonts package Wich ec-fonts package ? $ wget ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/ec.tar.gz ... $ tar ztf ec.tar.gz | grep

Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-11 Thread Karl Hammar
Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1 Hmm, I get them generated in /var/cache/... and you in /home/janneke/..., > > can that be of importance? > > This is just because Jan installed LilyPond in a directory where > he has write access, whereas you probably installed it in a read-only >

grace timing

2004-10-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > the beat; it feels strange that the beginning of a beat in some sense is > negative sometimes (though it's just infinitesimally). I have an idea of > another timing system that would feel more logical: We could use a metric > similar to the following (in terms of non-

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > There is still the problem that the outermost TeX box of a lilypond > > snippet has zero width. > > Ah, that's the problem. See for example > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2004-10/msg00100.html > > the last example, > >http://homepage.ma

Re: grace timing

2004-10-11 Thread Arno Waschk
An nice example for grace tuplets can be seen in two places of the first movement of Ravel's piano trio Regards, Arno On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:42:47 +0200, Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 11 October 2004 00.37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > be an app

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
Citerar Erik Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It would be nice to keep box-molecule in the Reharsal Marks section of > > the > > docs, but we could comment it out for now if necessary. I just don't > > think we > > should have a manual with obvious flaws for the stable release. :) > > More imp

grace timing

2004-10-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 11 October 2004 00.37, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > be an appoggiatura, where 3 notes take 1/8 time from the main note, could > > also be the very theoretical case > > { \grace {\times 2/3 {b16[ b b]} b16[ b]} b8 } > > which would mean that the first 3 notes are

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 11 October 2004 02.45, Graham Percival wrote: > On 10-Oct-04, at 3:57 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > bugs/boxed-rehearsal-marks.ly > > > > There is something fishy with the TeX code that I don't understand. > > Personally, I don't care much for this TeX bug. It will only affect > > lily

Re: lilypond-book documentation?

2004-10-11 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 11 October 2004 08.44, Graham Percival wrote: > Erik, if you want a simple example of lilypond-book (and if you would > like to help bughunt :), you could look at point #2 of > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2004-09/msg00266.html > > I'd like to test if the bug occurs o

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Werner LEMBERG writes: There is still the problem that the outermost TeX box of a lilypond snippet has zero width. Ah, that's the problem. See for example http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2004-10/msg00100.html Yes, the same problem appears also in lily

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Werner LEMBERG writes: > There is still the problem that the outermost TeX box of a lilypond > snippet has zero width. Ah, that's the problem. See for example http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2004-10/msg00100.html the last example, http://homepage.mac.com/neeracher/lilypo

Re: critical

2004-10-11 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> For Werner, I managed to reduce this to the following TeX > snippet. [...] Fixed in the CVS, please test. Reason for the problem was that negative \raise values change the box depth, but positive values the box height instead, and all changes to the box height are cancelled by the \vss in \topa

Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-11 Thread Mats Bengtsson
1 Hmm, I get them generated in /var/cache/... and you in /home/janneke/..., can that be of importance? This is just because Jan installed LilyPond in a directory where he has write access, whereas you probably installed it in a read-only directory (/usr/share/ or /usr/local/share, maybe). See als

Re: @internalsref{foo}

2004-10-11 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > this is related to the brokenness of the Texinfo macros. What exactly is broken? We should report that to texinfo. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org ___