Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > BTW. it should say ecrb10 in the subject line above. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > There should be no reason to build it yourself. See previous > > 4.8MB vs 4k is a good reason, esp. for a POTS modem user. > The problem is that the makefile doesn't build all fonts, see

Re: missing ecrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-08 Thread Karl Hammar
BTW. it should say ecrb10 in the subject line above. [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > There should be no reason to build it yourself. See previous 4.8MB vs 4k is a good reason, esp. for a POTS modem user. The problem is that the makefile doesn't build all fonts, see below. > announcements on Debian package

Re: lilypond 2.3.19 crashes with a few lilypond files.

2004-10-08 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 04 October 2004 14.22, Pascal Legris wrote: > Hi, > I have found the origin of the crash. > The problem occurs when you have at the same place an extender line in > lyrics and a page break. > suppress the extender line a end of line 67 (ven -- tris tu -- i __) in > my file and the crash d

Re: missing exrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
There should be no reason to build it yourself. See previous announcements on Debian packages for LilyPond 2.3.x in the mailing list archives. I'm not familiar with the details of the Debian installation, but the first step should be to run 'texhash' as root to make sure that the file name database

missing exrb10, how do I build it

2004-10-08 Thread Karl Hammar
Lilypond complains about missing exrb10 (see log below). http://lilypond.org/download/fonts/ says: cvs -d :ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/lilypond co sauter-fonts-mtraced but that doesn't work (it just sits there). Is subversions.org the right site ? I have downloaded: http://lilypond.org/do

Re: lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/notatio...

2004-10-08 Thread Mats Bengtsson
So, I learnt something new today! I'll revert the patch. However, there are several examples, both in input/*/* and in scm/define-context-properties.scm which set these properties in Staff or Score. Should I change them as well? Another feature that's slightly confusing is that \score { \r

Re: 'make all' failure ChangeLog 1.2688

2004-10-08 Thread Karl Hammar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Here's the tail end of the console output after 'make all' on RedHat 9 > with current CVS (ChangeLog 1.2688). .. > accidental-engraver.cc:258: `scm_is_eq' undeclared (first use this > function) > make[1]: *** [out/accidental-engraver.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving dire

lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/notatio...

2004-10-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Patches: > Index: lilypond/ChangeLog > diff -u lilypond/ChangeLog:1.2689 lilypond/ChangeLog:1.2690 > --- lilypond/ChangeLog:1.2689 Fri Oct 8 07:55:20 2004 > +++ lilypond/ChangeLogFri Oct 8 08:02:18 2004 > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ > 2004-10-08 Mats Bengtsson <[EMA

Re: 'make all' failure ChangeLog 1.2688

2004-10-08 Thread Karl Hammar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Here's the tail end of the console output after 'make all' on RedHat 9 > with current CVS (ChangeLog 1.2688). ... > accidental-engraver.cc:258: `scm_is_eq' undeclared (first use this > function) > make[1]: *** [out/accidental-engraver.o] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/

lilypond ./ChangeLog Documentation/user/notatio...

2004-10-08 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > The command @code{\bar [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a short cut for doing > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Timing.whichBar = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whenever @code{whichBar} > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Staff.whichBar = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whenever @code{whichBar} why did you make this correction