Re: 3.0

2004-09-20 Thread Edward Sanford Sutton, III
Lilypond 2.3 is marked as broken on freebsd. Now that I'we moved to freebsd, I notice a lot more when the luxury of an up to date lilypond doesn't exist. I will try to do what I can to help straighten it out before 3.0. Has anyone heard form Patrick Atamaniuk (the freebsd packager)? I have had

Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend

2004-09-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > I recall that it wasn't so long ago that not all distributions shipped > with fontconfig, which is instrumental in getting fonts from > ~/.fonts/ configured correctly. That's it! xset/xlsfonts has nothing todo with gnome/pango fonts. It seems gnome-font-install doesn

Bug status

2004-09-20 Thread Erik Sandberg
I checked through the bugs quickly, and I only found one bug that makes 2.3 strictly worse than 2.2, and hence prevent 3.0. That's titling-piece.ly. Erik ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-

Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend

2004-09-20 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > >> > $ ln -s ~/cvs/lilypond/mf/out ~/.fonts > >> > $ mkfontdir ~/.fonts > >> > $ xset +fp ~/.fonts > >> > >> Something went wrong here. Does xlsfonts report the feta fonts? > > > > Could it be that this is system/distribution specifi

Re: Mutopia .ly files don't "compile" ?

2004-09-20 Thread Chris Sawer
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blunt Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm just trying to get the hand of lilypond, & I thought I would grab some > .ly files from mutopia to use as lessons. Unfortunately, of the first batch > I downloaded, not one "compiles" under lilypond. They all r

Re: Lilypond and e-learning

2004-09-20 Thread Mats Bengtsson
lilypond-book is the way to go if you want to integrate music examples in your (static) HTML pages. However, if you have any intention to make it possible for students to have LilyPond installed on your web server with some interface that lets students write their own small scores and process them

Re: confusing layout parameters

2004-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> It should be mentioned in the documentation which layout parameters > are for which backend. For example, interscoreline is for > --format=tex only. Urgh. `interscoreline' has no more any effect since lilypond controls the layout of the whole page. Sigh. IMHO a major cleanup of the TeX back

Re: opposite of remove-tag urgently needed!

2004-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > score: > > > > \applymusic #(use-tag 'score) > > this will now be \keepWithTag #'score Thanks a lot! Werner ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

TeX capacity exceeded

2004-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
As others have already reported, with the current CVS it is very easy to exceed the TeX capacity. Reason is that the whole page is output as a single \hbox. I suggest to change it so that a single staff line is an \hbox. Werner ___ lilypond-dev

Re: worse page layout

2004-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> I'm not able to fine-tune the distances of systems in my multi-page > document! This seems to happen only for more complex pages; simple > tests are always successful. This is related to having \bookpaper *after* \book. It still doesn't work as I expect... Werner _

Re: minimumVerticalExtent confuses lilypond

2004-09-20 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> The example below confuses lilypond. After setting > minimumVerticalExtent, the `linewidth' parameter isn't applied > correctly. Again, this happens because \bookpaper comes after \score. Exchanging the blocks makes it work. Werner ___ lily

Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend

2004-09-20 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: >> > $ ln -s ~/cvs/lilypond/mf/out ~/.fonts >> > $ mkfontdir ~/.fonts >> > $ xset +fp ~/.fonts >> >> Something went wrong here. Does xlsfonts report the feta fonts? > > Could it be that this is system/distribution specific? Until we know what's wrong, it could be