On 24-Aug-04, at 4:12 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Great to see this being started!
I was going to ask if it looked ok to have multiple templates per page
-- ie
under the "Single staff" page, have
melody
melody with lyrics
melody with chords
melody with lyrics and chords
Then under the "piano musi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> +The first example gives you a staff with notes, suitable for a solo
> +instrument or a melodic fragment. Cut and paste this into a file,
> +add notes, and you're finished!
> +
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> +
> +melody = \relative c' {
> +\clef treble
> +\key c \major
> +\time
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> fixed in CVS.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > \header {texidoc = "slurs are placed above up- and downbow sometimes."}
> >
> > \score { \relative c''{
> > \clef alto
> > \slurUp
> > c4(^\downbow b) r2
> > c4^\downbow( b) r2
> > c4(^\upbow b) r2
> > c4^\upbow(
On 24-Aug-04, at 3:54 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I think the main problem is not the work to enter the code, but rather
the work to find out how to do it. I think the shortcuts help both
for newcomers who haven't yet learned how to set properties, somewhat
experienced people who still have problems
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 00.17, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> .6 fixes a few minor issues, among others, the disappearing metronome
> mark.
Nice! As far as the bug CVS is concerned,
- metronome has been fixed.
- midi-grace and disappearing-staff-lines are the most outstanding remaining
bugs, in my o
I think the main problem is not the work to enter the code, but rather
the work to find out how to do it.
I usually feel uncomfortable editing properties directly because it
feels like interaction with the core at too low a level of abstraction.
If these internal properties are changed or rename
After much wailing and gnashing of teeth (and help from Matthias, and me
running in circles and finally, when all else failed, learning how to
use patch(1) ), I've managed to build a CVS version of Lilypond on OSX.
I'm presenting this info for the archives so that others can find it.
If somebody th
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
May I ask for the reason of this change. I think it's very
convenient to have this kind of shortcut, especially for
scripts, where two different layout objects are involved,
depending on the type of script.
I deemed it unnecessary since there is a
