[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > To spur the adoption of LilyPond 2.3, I have decided to give 2.3 yet
> > another bonus-point over 2.2. The latest development release sports
> > the long-awaited rewrite of the slur code.
>
> This might indeed be a reason to switch. What about backporting? :-)
Yes
Hi,
I see that same values for page layout is defined in paper.scm, and a
few of them is hard-codded in set-paper-dimensions:
(define (set-paper-dimensions m w h)
"M is a module (i.e. paper->scope_ )"
(let* ((mm (eval 'mm m)))
(module-define! m 'hsize w)
(module-define! m 'vsize h)
> In fact, one of our regular contributor was recently seen
> recommending 2.2 over 2.3. This is, of course, heresy.
:-)
> To spur the adoption of LilyPond 2.3, I have decided to give 2.3 yet
> another bonus-point over 2.2. The latest development release sports
> the long-awaited rewrite of the
