Preferred use of define-grob-properties.scm

2004-07-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Currently, define-grob-properties.scm is (almost) alphabetical by > property. This makes it nice for avoiding the collisions that occur > when two different grobs have a property with the same name, but makes > it very difficult to see all the properties associated with

Preferred use of define-grob-properties.scm

2004-07-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > I've just added the properties for fret-diagrams, and they're scattered > > throughout define-grob-properties.scm. I'd be happy to collect them in > > one section if it's preferred. > > the problem is that we try to minimise the number of properties, and > reuse them

Preferred use of define-grob-properties.scm

2004-07-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Currently, define-grob-properties.scm is (almost) alphabetical by > property. This makes it nice for avoiding the collisions that occur > when two different grobs have a property with the same name, but makes > it very difficult to see all the properties associated with

Preferred use of define-grob-properties.scm

2004-07-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
Currently, define-grob-properties.scm is (almost) alphabetical by property. This makes it nice for avoiding the collisions that occur when two different grobs have a property with the same name, but makes it very difficult to see all the properties associated with a given grob. Would it make sens

Re: Documentation for Fret Diagram properties.

2004-07-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 17:18, Carl Sorensen wrote: > I've added documentation for fret diagram properties to > define-grob-properties.scm and define-grob-interfaces.scm. These > changes, along with updates to the ChangeLog are included in the > attached patch. > > Note: The CVS has not yet been u

Documentation for Fret Diagram properties.

2004-07-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
I've added documentation for fret diagram properties to define-grob-properties.scm and define-grob-interfaces.scm. These changes, along with updates to the ChangeLog are included in the attached patch. Note: The CVS has not yet been updated with my previous patch (20040705fret.patch), so the Cha

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-05 Thread Pedro Kroger
On Tue Jul 06, 2004 at 12:00:44AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > It looks like LilyPond uses another font than the PFA font that > xlsfonts finds (see updated output-gnome.scm instructions). Yah, I did the mkfontdir, xset thing already. > Do you have the latest lilypond CVS (not much more than

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-05 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kroger writes: > Indeed. I recompiled it and went ok this time. Great. > I have a question thought. Is the output of input/example-1.ly > supposed to look like the picture in the link below No, it's supposed to look fairly good. > (because is still experimental) or have I missed somethin

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-05 Thread Pedro Kroger
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 06:36:04PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Pedro Kroger writes: > > I'll recompile it, double checking if I missed something. > > That's easy: look at the bottom of lily/lily-guile.cc. If you're > using a correct config.h, this should work. Indeed. I recompiled it and we

Patch for fret diagrams

2004-07-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
applied, thanks. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Attached is a patch for fret-diagrams, including ChangeLog entries. The > patch does the following: > > Cleans up font selection (label fonts for dots were previously broken) > Moves the labeled dots as low as possible. > Cleans up some outdated comme

Patch for fret diagrams

2004-07-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
Attached is a patch for fret-diagrams, including ChangeLog entries. The patch does the following: Cleans up font selection (label fonts for dots were previously broken) Moves the labeled dots as low as possible. Cleans up some outdated comments. Better centers and sizes the white fonts on the blac

Re: Font troubles with Fedora Build from CVS

2004-07-05 Thread Carl Sorensen
On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 04:14, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > In addition to Jan's hints, don't forget to run the > command 'texhash' as root to update the file name database > used by TeX and friends. > > /Mats > Thanks. That fixed it! Carl ___ lilyp

Re: question for older version .ly

2004-07-05 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Unfortunately, convert-ly fails to handle some syntax changes that have happened since the original version of the file. In particular it has problems with the old text markup. Since the parenthesis for slurs have moved around in the syntax, convert-ly will unfortunately move around also some slurs

Re: Font troubles with Fedora Build from CVS

2004-07-05 Thread Mats Bengtsson
In addition to Jan's hints, don't forget to run the command 'texhash' as root to update the file name database used by TeX and friends. /Mats Carl Sorensen wrote: On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 03:40, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I think you'll see that the fonts are in a whole new direcory ./usr/share/texm