small fixes

2004-07-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > What should I do if I want to fix small (and possibly harmless) > things (like the --enable-gui thing): > > 1. should I silently fix it (you'll figure it out from the cvs log) > 2. should fix and post a message to the devel list > 3. should ask if I should/coul

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kroger writes: > [12:51:54] pythagoras kroger $ grep PANGO config.h > #define HAVE_PANGO_CVS 1 > #define HAVE_PANGO_FC_FONT_MAP_ADD_DECODER_FIND_FUNC 1 > > I'll recompile it, double checking if I missed something. That's easy: look at the bottom of lily/lily-guile.cc. If you're using a cor

Re: small fixes

2004-07-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kroger writes: > What should I do if I want to fix small (and possibly harmless) > things (like the --enable-gui thing): > > 1. should I silently fix it (you'll figure it out from the cvs log) Yes, please. Esp. for obvious mistakes like these. > 2. should fix and post a message to the dev

small fixes

2004-07-04 Thread Pedro Kroger
Hi, What should I do if I want to fix small (and possibly harmless) things (like the --enable-gui thing): 1. should I silently fix it (you'll figure it out from the cvs log) 2. should fix and post a message to the devel list 3. should ask if I should/could fix it Pedro

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Pedro Kroger
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 05:20:13PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Could you verify that you have > in your config.h? [12:51:54] pythagoras kroger $ grep PANGO config.h #define HAVE_PANGO_CVS 1 #define HAVE_PANGO_FC_FONT_MAP_ADD_DECODER_FIND_FUNC 1 I'll recompile it, double checking if I missed

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Pedro Kroger
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 05:05:14PM +0200, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > Is the description for --enable-gui supposed to be this?: > opps. fixes are welcome. :) ok, fixed in CVS :-) Pedro ___ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kroger writes: > Now it seems to be 'working' (i.e. found the modules), but I got > /home/kroger/lilypond/install//share/lilypond/2.3.5/scm/framework-gnome.scm:129:5: > While evaluating arguments to map in expression (map ly:pango-add-afm-decoder (quote > #)): Hmm, that's odd. --enable-

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 10:58:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > Great. You should tell LilyPond (ie, GUILE and the dynamic loader) > > about all this stuff you compiled (see output-gnome.scm) > > thanks for your email. I've added the output-gnome.scm as a file to

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Pedro Kroger
On Sun Jul 04, 2004 at 10:58:00AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Great. You should tell LilyPond (ie, GUILE and the dynamic loader) > about all this stuff you compiled (see output-gnome.scm) thanks for your email. I've added the output-gnome.scm as a file to be checked in the last announcement

THANKS

2004-07-04 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
A thought just occurred to me; we make a habit of listing bugreporters in the THANKS file. Maybe you could also add names of the bug reporters to the THANKS file, once their bug(s) have fixed and closed. How about that? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~h

Re: Using gdb with lilypond

2004-07-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Carl Sorensen writes: > I'm ready to start work on developing a fret-diagrams context and > engraver. Great. > So I rebuild lilypond, starting > with > ./autogen.sh --enable-debugging > > make all This is OK. > make install This will strip the (debugging) symbols. You should be using lily/

Re: guile-gnome

2004-07-04 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Pedro Kroger writes: > sh guile-gnome.sh now runs fine and compile ok. But, what am I > supposed to do next? Great. You should tell LilyPond (ie, GUILE and the dynamic loader) about all this stuff you compiled (see output-gnome.scm) export GUILE_LOAD_PATH=$HOME/usr/pkg/g-wrap/share/guile/s