On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 03:12, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> AFAICS your patches were not yet applied; if it's not too much
> trouble could you please send a full cvs diff (ie: all patches together?)
>
> Jan.
Oops!!! Now with the patch attached, I hope.
Here's the patch for all files based on the
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 03:12, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> AFAICS your patches were not yet applied; if it's not too much
> trouble could you please send a full cvs diff (ie: all patches together?)
>
> Jan.
Attached is a patch for all the files, including the ChangeLog (thanks
to Heikki for the tip
On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 03:12, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> AFAICS your patches were not yet applied; if it's not too much
> trouble could you please send a full cvs diff (ie: all patches together?)
>
> Jan.
I'll be working on that this evening. If all goes well, I'll have it
done in an hour or
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> Maybe AC_DISABLE_STATIC or AC_DISABLE_SHARED in configure.in, then.
Ok. I haven't got the time to look at this now, there also is a litte
problem with libtool.m4; apparently my libtoolize patch to autogen.sh
does not work (at least not with --srcdir builds, or it's some
> Hmm, I only remember having seen the ps. Do you have a search
> string google could use?
I just did a google search by myself, without results.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nicolas Sceaux writes:
>
>> What I have understood is that it's a matter of --disable-shared or
>> --disable-static during configure.
>
> Ok. It's a small thing, but I we'll want to disable on of them by
> default, I guess. I'd like to make the pac
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> What I have understood is that it's a matter of --disable-shared or
> --disable-static during configure.
Ok. It's a small thing, but I we'll want to disable on of them by
default, I guess. I'd like to make the packagers (who need to build
both the static -dev and shared
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've just tried with g-wrap from [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead
>> of [EMAIL PROTECTED], guile-gnome compiles fine now.
>
> and additionally,
> guile -s ../src/libgnomecanvas/examples/canvas.scm
> does not fail at the moment.
Gr
Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just tried with g-wrap from [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead
> of [EMAIL PROTECTED], guile-gnome compiles fine now.
>
and additionally,
guile -s ../src/libgnomecanvas/examples/canvas.scm
does not fail at the moment.
__
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please do not use GUILE CVS yet. It has been broken the past few
> weeks. I thought the troubles were over, but apparently they are not.
>
> The point #3 [removed] in the guile-gnome.sh script used to be, and
> still should be, probably:
>
> #3
10 matches
Mail list logo