On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:10:32PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> What about the removal report and the gs bug, I assume that this
>
> > * gs-gpl 8.01 (and gs-afpl 8.14) dies when building LilyPond docs.
> > (Known -sDEVICE=bbox bug in gs 8.01 and newer, see gs-gpl Bug#250290.)
> > Ad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>
> >> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason;
> >> It used to work.
> >
> > Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS.
>
> Dirk has fixed it. Most looks ok now apart from:
>
> + guile -s ../src/libgnom
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason;
>> It used to work.
>
> Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS.
Dirk has fixed it. Most looks ok now apart from:
+ guile -s ../src/libgnomecanvas/examples/canvas.scm
(gnome gtk): [glib
Anthony Fok writes:
> Oops, I didn't see that, but that is sure alarming...
That is sure alarming...
> Actually, I already uploaded LilyPond 2.2.2-2 last Friday. Sorry, life
> had been very hectic over the last few months, and it took me about two or
> three days to catch up with the latest ha
Hello Jan and all,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:10:43PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Just found this post
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/06/msg00077.html
>
> saying
>
> # Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok)remove lilypond/2.1.0-2
> # 250622 [
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over
> maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon
> now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist
> with the old g-wrap packages).
Great, this is very good news!
> I th
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> I'm not exactly sure what this means, or what any of you can do about
> this, but it does give me warm fuzzies.
^NOT
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lil
Just found this post
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/06/msg00077.html
saying
# Package: lilypond (optional; Anthony Fok)remove lilypond/2.1.0-2
# 250622 [ ] lilypond: FTBFS error: `gs' failed (status 139)
# no maintainer reaction
remove lilypond/2.1.
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Scott Webber writes:
I'm having trouble building. Here's what make is outputting:
/usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link
Ok, wrong guile.
I have guile 1.6.4 built from the tarball.
[BTW, why did you do that, your /usr
Scott Webber writes:
> Hi, I'm trying to get into lilypond development. Possibly add some
> cool percussion stuff.
Great.
> I'm having trouble building. Here's what make is outputting:
> /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link
Ok, wrong guile.
> I have guile 1
10 matches
Mail list logo
