Bonjour Han-Wen!
Wed, 26 May 2004 14:06:35 +0200, tu as dit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> I've encountered a problem that outreach my knowledge: with the
>> following ly file, lilypond-bin (current CVS) hangs:
>>
>> #(define foo #{ #})
>> #(define quux #{ #})
>> \score { \notes { c' }
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should have makeinfo 4.7, emacs CVS to see them, and info/pictures
> installed as:
so emacs is the reason I was unable to see the pictures (I have
21.3). I'm going to compile it from cvs (oh boy! I hope I don't have
to make unofficial packages o
Sorry, it went to the bad list.
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> There are 3 things:
What about 4:
* think about library interface (mostly ly: now)
It would be nice (TM) to have something like:
(ly:parse-xxx ) -->
(ly:render ) -->
so that lib users can: save parsed music tree, render music from music
tree created from d
I’m trying to package lilypond 2.2.1
The info directory contains no images. I checked
Pedro’s and Feri’s package. They didn’t contain images as
well. Shouldn’t they? What’s wrong?
Bert
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't know about the package naming conventions in Debian, but
> wouldn't it be better to use a name like lilypond (without version
> number) for the stable versions and lilypond-unstable (or whatever)
> for the unstable versions. Otherwise, you will
Pedro Kroger writes:
> As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package.
Great!
[snip]
> *I still don't have pictures in my info files, but I don't know if the
> problem is in my system, emacs, texinfo, lilypond, or debian. I have
> to dig further. This is the major thing missing in m
Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> As it is now, all is fine for me, I can try little hacks.
Ok.
> However, if you want me to try to go on and polish lily-as-a-lib, I'll
> do that.
I'm not sure. It feels as a good step that we'll maybe need in about
a year, so I think it can wait.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Wed, 26 May 2004 11:23:38 +0200, tu a dit :
>
> > Nicolas Sceaux writes:
> >> I was experimenting this week end with lilypond called directly from
> >> scheme (without using lilypond-bin).
>
> > That's interesting. If you want I can help with install rules, but w
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Hi folks,
[it's a long email, sorry]
As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package. It's based
on the previous work by Fok but I deleted the unnecessary stuff (like
specific code for lily 1.3 and 1.7 for example) and made it
"independent" of the stable one, i.e., y
Andreas Rottmann writes:
> The bindings of GTK+ 2 are maintained, but there are no tarballs as
> of yet. You can grab it via Arch, however.
I've added very experimental gnome canvas output to LilyPond CVS,
using TLA guile-gnome. This is of course, very hacker only.
Do you/we have a vague planni
11 matches
Mail list logo
