Re: GC question

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> How are grobs created by make_item from within perfomers protected >> from GC? I couldn't find any container object which calls their >> mark_smob function. (I'm rather tired right now, so I suspect I am >> overlooking

Re: GC question

Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >> >> How are grobs created by make_item from within perfomers protected >> >> from GC? I couldn't find any container object which calls th

Re: GC question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> How are grobs created by make_item from within perfomers protected > >> from GC? I couldn't find any container object which calls their > >> mark_smob function. (I'm rather tired right

GC question

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > How are grobs created by make_item from within perfomers protected > from GC? I couldn't find any container object which calls their > mark_smob function. (I'm rather tired right now, so I suspect I am > overlooking something very simple.) Have a look at the smobify_s

makefile changes for lilypond shared lib

Hello, I was experimenting this week end with lilypond called directly from scheme (without using lilypond-bin). I had to make few changes in the stepmake rules in order to generate a .so shared library. Here is a patch, just in case of... `make shared-lib' generates the lib; this is rudimentary,

GC question

How are grobs created by make_item from within perfomers protected from GC? I couldn't find any container object which calls their mark_smob function. (I'm rather tired right now, so I suspect I am overlooking something very simple.) -- Michael Welsh Duggan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___