On Monday March 1 2004 10:36, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Same goes for SVG output and a number of FOO2ly import scripts.
I personally wish the scripts were better. I don't know how I would find it
good to implement them though. The midi2ly didn't seem to pay much attention
to what I said about
i love to chat to just about anyone!!
pass: 47388
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Automake and autoconf deserve to wither and die, but unfortunately
> > noone at GNU seems to make much of an effort to euthanasize them.
>
> Please explain. Do you see an alternative?
Scons?
(www.scons.org)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The biggest one is to have binary distributions that are statically linked
> and can run in-place. This would help a lot of users who don't otherwise
> have access to pre-built packages without requiring them to build
static linking is not an option for LilyPond. GUILE
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 08:43:55PM +0100, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
[interactive Scheme]
> > try #(top-repl)
>
> that's cute :-)
Indeed. Allthough it's a guile-feature, it should be mentioned somewhere
in the documentation.
I'll record all glitches/pitfalls/tricks while learning LilyPond
internals.
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
> Automake and autoconf deserve to wither and die, but unfortunately
> noone at GNU seems to make much of an effort to euthanasize them.
Please explain. Do you see an alternative? IMHO using autoconf has
become much more reliable in the last two years or so.
Werner
_
Mon, 1 Mar 2004 00:46:18 +0100, Han-Wen a dit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> since I'd like to become a "brilliant LilyPond hacker", and I currently
>> want to do some more ore less evil scheme hacking, I wonder wether
>> there's an easy way to debug scheme code or to get something like an
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> Dependencies on package versions which haven't been released yet?
> Normally, relying on a CVS version is dangerous.
I agree, but I don't think we ever had such dependencies (except maybe
temporarily, by mistake).
>> I have implemented PostScript output some three or fou
Mats Bengtsson writes:
> I have to agree with others on this list. Jan and Han-Wen do a
> terrific job with LilyPond. One of the few objections I have is
> that they sometimes are too eager to adopt new technology.
Yes, possibly. The point is that I believe in open source, and broken
software ne
Mats observed:
> Of course it would be nice to be able to view pictures with
> examples also in the info version of the document, but I see
> absolutely no reason for LilyPond to be a pioneer for this
> feature.
This is a very sensible observation. LilyPond is a music typesetter, hence
I'm happy
Look it through
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >yes, looks fine, just add it at the bottom of the conversion list.
> >
> >
> >
> With 2.1.28 I get the following warning:
>
> warning: lily-guile: make-music-by-name is deprecated. Use make-music
> instead.
>
> Since I don't find any instances of 'make-music-by-nam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > know how to type apt-get upgrade (or suffer if they choose to use a
> > more cumbersome system ;-)
>
> Even then -- I tried to compile the texinfo CVS, which relies on a
> brand new automake version which I had to compile before, which relies
> on a brand new autoconf
I have to agree with others on this list. Jan and Han-Wen do a
terrific job with LilyPond. One of the few objections I have is
that they sometimes are too eager to adopt new technology.
Of course it would be nice to be able to view pictures with
examples also in the info version of the document, bu
> > The less latest-version-or-newer packages are needed,
> > the better. lilypond already needs too much packages to work.
>
> What package dependencies do you suggest we drop?
Dependencies on package versions which haven't been released yet?
Normally, relying on a CVS version is dangerous.
>
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Nigel Warner writes:
> Gnash, Gnash using 2.1.26 under Cygwin it appears that the
> previous beheviour of lilypond-book has been furtwanglered.
This was a bug which has been fixed in CVS, or in any release that has
this ChangeLog entry:
* scripts/lilypond-book.py (do_file
Hi! My name is Shreya and I am a goof off!!! So, If you love the outdoors,
travelling, books, music, movies, laffing, teasing and/or can poke fun at yourself...
please come a hollerin'!!
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't updated convert-ly (not sure about it). Maybe something like
that should be added (?)
def conv (str):
str = re.sub ('make-music-by-name', 'make-music',str)
return str
conversions.append (((2,1,), conv, """More
I love to dance, read poetry, make people laugh, and hug as many people a day as i can.
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Everything inside the attach
<>
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo
