Re: ugly triplet brackets

2004-02-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > Lilypond fails to compile latest cvs, Changelog 1.1707: Try again now. Han-Wen (hacking away at CVS) -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen ___ Lilypond-devel mailing

Re: ugly triplet brackets

2004-02-13 Thread Pedro Kroger
Hi, Lilypond fails to compile latest cvs, Changelog 1.1707: == Now processing: `lily-2003481231.ly' Parsing...warning: Can't find property type-check for `octavation' (music-type?). Perhaps you made a typing error? lilypond-book:

ugly triplet brackets

2004-02-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have changed > from > > 3 > > to > > 3 > > which is ugly. Was this intentional? If yes, why? Semi-intentional. The gap was off by a factor two relative to its definition. I've upda

wrong positioned rests

2004-02-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
[CVS 2004-02-12 14:35 MET] Is there any progress on the rests problem I've reported a few days ago? For me it is very problematic since chords appear very often in piano music. I've attached the image again. Werner <>___ Lilypond-devel mailing l

ugly triplet brackets

2004-02-13 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Recently, the (default) appearance of triplet brackets have changed from 3 to 3 which is ugly. Was this intentional? If yes, why? Werner ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman

Re: Slur attachment / collisions and cadenza problems

2004-02-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have the same problem. Slurs collide with articulation marks. I posted a > message like yours a couple of weeks ago and I had no answer. > Maybe this problem is difficult to solve without manual hacks and developers > are busy to solve problems with higer priority.

Re: Slur attachment / collisions and cadenza problems

2004-02-13 Thread Marco Gusy
I have the same problem. Slurs collide with articulation marks. I posted a message like yours a couple of weeks ago and I had no answer. Maybe this problem is difficult to solve without manual hacks and developers are busy to solve problems with higer priority. We'll wait.. they did such a great

rest bugs

2004-02-13 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > % . Rests belonging to a voice in a multi-voice staff are incorrectly > % moved to the default position. In the example below, bar two, the > % quarter rests are positioned correctly while the eighth rests should > % be moved up. > % > % This is a severe bug. >