> > What do you think about some abbreviations like `\tight' to change
> > the default settings?
>
> Haven't thought about this yet. Are they that common?
It might be useful for fine-tuning a document. Of course, it should
work locally:
\tightspacing
...
\normalspacing
> Perhaps the def
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Look at this input and the attached image:
>
> \context Staff \notes \relative c' {
> r16 e\rest c[( d r e]) c[( d e\rest e])
> }
>
> The second `e\rest' doesn't work to change the vertical position.
> I've already reported this a more than a year ago...
Fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > try the space-alist property of TimeSignature, and add
> >
> > (next-note . (semi-fixed-space AMOUNT))
> >
> > Or somesuch; check the define-grobs.scm for examples.
>
> Thanks. The meaning of `semi-fixed-space', etc. is of course
> completely undocumented...
I
[flup to lilypond-devel]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > Yes - I'm not sure what is the best way to go about. Documenting all
> > of them may lead to duplication and inconsistencies. What do you think?
>
> Well, I took a closer look, and I don't think what's in Program-reference
> -> Markup Func
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > The right bearing of meter signs appears to be fixed and thus much
> > too big (see attached image).
>
> Incidentally, the image shows another problem (I've attached it
> again): The ledger lines of the e-flat note are not symmetric. It
> probably makes sense to shor
> try the space-alist property of TimeSignature, and add
>
> (next-note . (semi-fixed-space AMOUNT))
>
> Or somesuch; check the define-grobs.scm for examples.
Thanks. The meaning of `semi-fixed-space', etc. is of course
completely undocumented...
What do you think about some abbreviations
> The right bearing of meter signs appears to be fixed and thus much
> too big (see attached image).
Incidentally, the image shows another problem (I've attached it
again): The ledger lines of the e-flat note are not symmetric. It
probably makes sense to shorten the ledger line at the left side w
