Building LilyPond-1.8.0 for RH-1.7

2003-08-18 Thread Richard Shann
I have built and installed LilyPond-1.8.0 under RedHat 1.7, doing the default things suggested in INSTALL.txt (including the font cleaning step and updating /etc/profile.d). I needed to build and install guile-1.6.4 to do this. I found that some gnome applications crashed when I set the LD_LIBR

Re: [Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Eric Gebhart
Any idea why I had to edit the parser.cc output by Bison? Or that I had to define HAVE_KPATHSEA_KPATHSEA_H ? - Jan Nieuwenhuizen's Original Message - > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > > I hope you are finding all of this useful. > > Yes, I redirected it to the list, so that it may be usef

Re: Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings

2003-08-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > So, why not double the number of markings, by matching, for example, ^( > > > with ^) and _( with _), while for -( -) there would be attached a flag > > > which attaches it to the "up

Re: Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings

2003-08-18 Thread Heikki Johannes Junes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > So, why not double the number of markings, by matching, for example, ^( > > with ^) and _( with _), while for -( -) there would be attached a flag > > which attaches it to the "upper" or "lower" marking group. This coul

Feature request: independent upper and lower staff markings

2003-08-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > So, why not double the number of markings, by matching, for example, ^( > with ^) and _( with _), while for -( -) there would be attached a flag > which attaches it to the "upper" or "lower" marking group. This could be a because it is inconsistent: _ and ^ are only u

Um ... new website frontpage

2003-08-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > Once the moment of bliss the new, completely redone version of the > web site has passed, I am left with a few doubts. I'll only focus on > the front page for the moment. > > - "The name is Pond ... LilyPond" is cute. If you're trying to 'sell' > your product to

Re: New website

2003-08-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Juergen Reuter wrote: > > > > > Of course, the "Tutorial (start here)" should *not* point to the > > combined tutorial / user manual page, but *only* to the tutorial. > > Otherwise, the title of the link should be considered wrong. > > > > ..

Re: [Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > The real problem with KPATHSEA was getting the include files > included. > > Adding HAVE_HPATHSEA_KPATHSEA_H to my CPPFLAGS got me past that > part. I'm not sure why it wasn't true to begin with, but that was > preventing the include of kpathsea.h and tex-file.h in k

Re: [Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Ok, this is a real hack, but I compiled parser.yy by hand, > > bison -o foo.cc parser.yy > > At line 4962 there is this code. > > #if defined (__GNUC_MINOR__) && 2093 <= (__GNUC__ * 1000 + __GNUC_MINOR__) > __attribute__ ((__unused__)) > #endif > > I deleted those 3 l

Feature request: 15-transposed clefs (fwd)

2003-08-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > ;; ugh. cleanme > > (if (equal? "5" (substring cl (- l 1) l)) > > (if (equal? "1" (substring cl (- l 2) (- l 1))) > > (begin > > (if (equal? "^" (substring cl (- l 3) (- l 2))) > > (set!

Re: [Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > I hope you are finding all of this useful. Yes, I redirected it to the list, so that it may be useful for others, and that we may keep an archive. > Lilypond seems to be working. I had to install latex2e which I hadn't done > previously. It sure is a lot faster! > >

[Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
From: Eric Gebhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To

[Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
From: Eric Gebhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL P

[Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
From: Eric Gebhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PRO

[Eric Gebhart] Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error.

2003-08-18 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
From: Eric Gebhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 1.8 compile - syntax error. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PRO