Re: Tablature patch

2002-08-01 Thread Lamy Jean-Baptiste
On 2002.07.31 16:52:10 +0200 Rune Zedeler wrote: > Hi Jean! > I have made this little patch for the tablature engraver. > I posted it on the list but as you did not reply I send this to you. > Ofcourse I will not commit it before you have said wheter it is okay. > > Idea is: > No functionality ha

Re: feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Rune Zedeler
Simon Bailey wrote: > i don't know if this is any help, but i just checked in a bärenreiter > edition of the water music. the 8th rest is at an angle of 69°, the 16th > at 78°, the 32nd also at 78°. Thanks for the info. I tried to slant the 8th rest 69 degrees but that looks too wild. So I have

Re: feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Simon Bailey
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 12:48, Rune Zedeler wrote: > Thanks for the info. you're welcome. here's another interesting thing i did find -- a unicode draft of musical symbols. probably not of any use at all, but if you're interested, here it is. http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U1D100.pdf greetings,

Re: feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Ok, some general comment I have : can you look closely at 16th and > > higher rests in Real Print? Notwithstanding the imperfections of the > > previous ones, I believe shorter rests are less slanted; now the > > longer the rest is, the more space it takes, that can't

Re: feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Simon Bailey
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 12:25, Rune Zedeler wrote: > Well, I already did this and came to the same conclusion - and so the > first attempt already contain different slants ; the 8th rest is at a 75 > degree angle while the 128th rest is at a 77 degree angle. I'll try > increase the difference a b

Re: feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Rune Zedeler
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Ok, some general comment I have : can you look closely at 16th and > higher rests in Real Print? Notwithstanding the imperfections of the > previous ones, I believe shorter rests are less slanted; now the > longer the rest is, the more space it takes, that can't be right

feta-rest patch 1st attempt

2002-08-01 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Yep, first attempt this is. Ok, some general comment I have : can you look closely at 16th and higher rests in Real Print? Notwithstanding the imperfections of the previous ones, I believe shorter rests are less slanted; now the longer the rest is, the more space it ta