Re: [PATCH] Tablature

2002-06-11 Thread Rune Zedeler
Lamy Jean-Baptiste wrote: > - default string tuning is now at the right octavo Eh, no, you transposed the wrong direction, now it is TWO octaves off. The high e-string should end up between the two upper note-lines when notated in the "G_8"-clef. -Rune __

PANIC

2002-06-11 Thread Rune Zedeler
Dear list, sorry to be nagging you once again. :-( I know that I have been flooding this list with my own problems lately. But this time is the most serious problem I have ever had. My music studies are about to be over, and on thursday morning (yikes!) I have to hand in a written musical assign

CLA(O)P II

2002-06-11 Thread Rune Zedeler
The concert went well. I talked to the composer and he agreed to include the score in lilypond as long as his name was maintained and as long as he kept the copyrights - that is people are not allowed to make changes to the score. I think including CLA(O)P II is a Good Thing because it stress t

emacs mode request

2002-06-11 Thread Heikki Johannes Junes
> I have a tiny annoyance in the emacs mode which usually makes revert > to the command line: when I have lily-tex-xdvi'd a file, I usually > make some edits to the .ly file. When I press C-c C-c I would expect > the emacs mode to detect the edits, and suggest that I run LilyPond > again. Curren

[PATCH] Tablature

2002-06-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi ! > > This patch (intended to be applied to the CVS) fix the following bugs : > > - stringTunings property is now declared > - Accidental are now totally removed (before, there were just transparent, > but it seems it can cause crash) > - default string tuning i

[PATCH] Tablature

2002-06-11 Thread Lamy Jean-Baptiste
Hi ! This patch (intended to be applied to the CVS) fix the following bugs : - stringTunings property is now declared - Accidental are now totally removed (before, there were just transparent, but it seems it can cause crash) - default string tuning is now at the right octavo - up-to-staff S

Re: Missing begin repeat?

2002-06-11 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Rune> Because you just before the \repeat-statement has a \bar statement > Rune> which in effect overrides the repeat bar. > > Rune> Just remove the \bar "|" before the repeat-command. > > Yes, but is that really what's supposed to happen? I would think t