The .cvsignore-file seems to be ignored by cvs...
When doing a update after a make and a make clean cvs still ?s all the
out-dirs...
-Rune
___
Lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
Well, I hope that the emacs mode will end up being able to fully cope
with multi line comments and multiline scheme.
When the mode is invoked (when a file is read or with M-x LilyPond-mode)
then all multi-line schemes and multi-line comments are correctly
parsed. But if you edit any of those -
Hi!
Attached is a patch that introduces ligature brackets (anyone knows a
better term for these beasts?). These brackets are used in modern
notation when transcribing mensural music; they simply mark a series
of notes that, in the original notation, formed a ligature.
Example:
c d e \[ f g a g
> > "Heikki" == Heikki Johannes Junes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Just insert
> >> \apply #unfold-music
>
> Heikki> It worked, but is there reason to fold music in midi?
> Heikki> For brevity music is folded sometimes in paper.
>
> Those of us who use the MIDI for pr
> "Heikki" == Heikki Johannes Junes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Just insert
>> \apply #unfold-music
Heikki> It worked, but is there reason to fold music in midi?
Heikki> For brevity music is folded sometimes in paper.
Those of us who use the MIDI for proofreading like ha
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> It's because of the internals. Things would get a lot easier, if the
> paper and midi block were separated, so we could apply different music
> functions for these situations, i.e.
>
> \midi {
> \notes { .. }
>
> }
>
> \paper {
>
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
> What about a function with which the midi could be unfolded but the paper
> output would be folded at the same time?
Eh, I don't know if this would be possible... It would be a bit of a
hack, at least... hmmm... I'll think about it - some time...
> Now I have to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
>
> >>\apply #unfold-music
>
> > It worked, but is there reason to fold music in midi?
> > For brevity music is folded sometimes in paper.
>
> Eh, sorry I don't understand the question...
> No there's no reason to fold the music in midi
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> In my ~/.cvsrc, I have
>
> cvs -z6
> diff -pu
> checkout -P
> update -P
>
> I always get unified diffs :-)
I have exactly the same in mine - but I still doesn't get unified diffs
this way.
-Rune
___
Lilyp
> If your question was like: "If there is no reason, why, then isn't the
> music unfolded automatically?", then I'm afraid I cannot really answer
> you...
>
> -Rune
>
What about a function with which the midi could be unfolded but the paper
output would be folded at the same time? Now I have
Heikki Johannes Junes wrote:
>>\apply #unfold-music
> It worked, but is there reason to fold music in midi?
> For brevity music is folded sometimes in paper.
Eh, sorry I don't understand the question...
No there's no reason to fold the music in midi - that is why you apply
the unfold-function
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Rune Zedeler wrote:
> In order for repeats to work in midi, you have to use unfolded repeats.
> The scheme-function "unfold-repeats" unfolds all repeats in its argument
> music.
> Just insert
> \apply #unfold-music
It worked, but is there reason to fold music in midi?
For
12 matches
Mail list logo
