[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It is a serious limitation that it is so hard to specify breakpoints of beams.
> I would like a command to say that "no beams can cross this point".
> Or at least that [c8] results in a flagged c instead of something unusable (c
> wih neither beam nor flag).
> Attached
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It is a serious limitation that it is so hard to specify breakpoints of beams.
> I would like a command to say that "no beams can cross this point".
> Or at least that [c8] results in a flagged c instead of something unusable (c
> wih neither beam nor flag).
--- beam
[List: this is all very experimental]
Hi Mats,
It seems that we're going to get a fully functional tetex setup in
cygwin. This allows us to drop wrapper scripts, most hairy
environment stuff, and the kpathsea linked with lilypond will work
too. I've been busy trying to package a texmf tree, and
It is a serious limitation that it is so hard to specify breakpoints of beams.
I would like a command to say that "no beams can cross this point".
Or at least that [c8] results in a flagged c instead of something unusable (c
wih neither beam nor flag).
Attached an example. It is hopefully easy to
%Oops. I'm not used to IMP.
\version "1.4.9"
\header {
dedication = "Namo Summaambuddhassa"
title = "Joy to the World"
composer = "Haendel"
poet = "allegro"
% poet is not in the same typeface as composer.
instrument = "Arr. for Solo Guitar by David Raleigh Arnold"
copyright = "\cent
I cannot begin to tell you how disappointed I was to finish this simple
two part arrangement, which does considerable violence to Haendel but
is made very easy for beginners, to find that the augmentation dots are
not down when \stemDowm is in effect. What possible reason could there
be not to
