bug in guile-1.4-1

Hi, I found a bug in guile-1.4-1: [...] r.o ./out/volta-spanner.o ./out/warn.o ./out/lexer.o ./out/parser.o ./out/../../flower/out /library.a -pg -lkpathsea -lintl -s -pg -L/usr/local/lib -lguile -lregex -lm /usr/local/lib/libguile.a(net_db.o): In function `scm_resolv_error': /home/cygwin/

Re: lily on cygwin problems continued

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb am 2001-09-23, 1:49: >Hi, > >I started lilypond.exe with gdb. >Now, the log: >$ gdb -nw lilypond.exe >GNU gdb 5.0 (20010428-1) >[...] >(gdb) run >Starting program: /perl/stuff/sound/lilybuild/lilypond-1.5.11/lily/out/lilypond.exe >GNU LilyPond 1.5.11 >Program received sign

lily on cygwin problems continued

Hi, I started lilypond.exe with gdb. Now, the log: $ gdb -nw lilypond.exe GNU gdb 5.0 (20010428-1) [...] (gdb) run Starting program: /perl/stuff/sound/lilybuild/lilypond-1.5.11/lily/out/lilypond.exe GNU LilyPond 1.5.11 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x100150b0 in _size_of_st

Re: lylipond 1.6

Jérémie Lumbroso schrieb am 2001-09-22, 23:40: > >GPH> Is there a schedule when lily 1.6 will be released? >Not before long, or else it'd be ridiculous. Development >versions 1.5.x have just begun!!! Why do you need Lily 1.6 >anyway? Isn't 1.4.7 fine? It doesn't build on cygwin. 1.5.11 doe

lylipond 1.6

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi all, > > Is there a schedule when lily 1.6 will be released? no! We've only just started hacking :-) Seriously: when we can get the spacing and grace code stabilised, it might be time for a 1.6. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| http://www.cs.uu.

Re: lylipond 1.6

GPH> Is there a schedule when lily 1.6 will be released? Not before long, or else it'd be ridiculous. Development versions 1.5.x have just begun!!! Why do you need Lily 1.6 anyway? Isn't 1.4.7 fine? -- Best regards, Jérémiemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ly2dvi error

Jérémie Lumbroso schrieb am 2001-09-22, 18:21: >Hi Gerrit, > > >GPH> I have built lilypond on cygwin. >Woohoo! Good job. > > >GPH> Now i need to do tests, but the first tries already stuck. >GPH> I'm getting this error from ly2dvi: > >GPH> $ ly2dvi minuet.ly >GPH> Running LilyPond... >GPH> Traceb

Re: 1.4.7 building on cygwin

Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb am 2001-09-22, 18:17: >"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I don't like that part of the lily-build (install) on cygwin. >> /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -d /etc/postinstall >> /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c

lylipond 1.6

Hi all, Is there a schedule when lily 1.6 will be released? Gerrit -- =^..^= ___ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Re: 1.4.7 building on cygwin

Jan Nieuwenhuizen schrieb am 2001-09-22, 20:40: >"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It is tetex not miktex included (tetex is in the standard PATH settings and >> if one makes use of it, it is set up correct). > >Btw: > >BTW, the documentation in the second attempt builds fine, m

Re: Beam-patch - first try

22-Sep-01 Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: HN> I originally chose the minimum-denominator criterium, because it HN> matches nicely with the way binary meters are built up. I have my yes, as long as you use a binary meter with no tuplets then it works. As soon as you insert triplets it goes wrong. like in

Re: 1.4.7 building on cygwin

"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is tetex not miktex included (tetex is in the standard PATH settings > and if one makes use of it, it is set up correct). Btw: BTW, the documentation in the second attempt builds fine, maybe the '--with-kpathsea' flag to ./configure makes a

Re: 1.4.7 building on cygwin

"Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't like that part of the lily-build (install) on cygwin. > /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -d /etc/postinstall > /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -m 644 ./out/post-gs.sh >/etc/postinstall/ If you

1.4.7 building on cygwin

Hi, I don't like that part of the lily-build (install) on cygwin. /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -d /etc/postinstall /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh -c -m 644 ./out/post-gs.sh /etc/postinstall/ && /bin/sh ../.././stepmake/stepmake/../bin/install-sh

Re: Beam-patch - first try

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > HN>> Now I have the first version of the beaming patch. > HN>> My idea is to split the beamed section at the middle of duration if this > HN>> was possible. > HN> > HN> I disagree with this. The split points are determined by the > HN> meter. What if you have 9 16ths (

Re: Beam-patch - first try

Den 22-Sep-01 skrev Han-Wen Nienhuys: HN>> Now I have the first version of the beaming patch. HN>> My idea is to split the beamed section at the middle of duration if this HN>> was possible. HN> HN> I disagree with this. The split points are determined by the HN> meter. What if you have 9 16ths

Beam-patch - first try

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Now I have the first version of the beaming patch. > My idea is to split the beamed section at the middle of duration if this > was possible. I disagree with this. The split points are determined by the meter. What if you have 9 16ths (triplet) in 3/8? > + /* YIKES!