Hello Alexander,
1. You mistake recission for termination; they are different.
2. The license should be evaluated as a unilateral contract, which allows
the construction in the CAL.
Thanks,
Van
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.open
Hi everyone,
it hasn’t popped up here or on l-r, but my girlfriend found
https://blueoakcouncil.org/2019/03/06/model.html which links
to https://blueoakcouncil.org/license/1.0.0 for a new licence.
Posting here because it hasn’t been submitted for review yet,
so we can discuss, if someone is inter
I believe this was created by lawyers well known to us who, in their
attempt to use plain language, might shoot themselves in the foot.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 10:37 AM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> • it looks like it has been written without a lawyer involved at
> all, not even looking it over aft
>>-Original Message-
>>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org]
>>On Behalf Of Thorsten Glaser
>>Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 10:37 AM
>>To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
>>Subject: [License-discuss] Blue Oak Model License 1.0.0
>>• it looks like i
Dixi quod…
>• We also both found the reference to linking to that web page in
> particular problematic (“At some point in the future, that page
> may well disappear, or become something else, or have a "refined"
> form of the license terms that is non-copyfree”), but as handing
> out the compl
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:44 PM Smith, McCoy wrote:
>
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org]
> >>On Behalf Of Thorsten Glaser
> >>Sent: Monday, July 29, 2019 10:37 AM
> >>To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> >>Subject:
The problematic wording is this:
"This License terminates automatically if You fail to comply with any of
the conditions in section 2."
Two problems:
1. New York law does not allow automatic termination.
"Even assuming Graham materially breached the licensing agreement and that
James was entitl
