Marc,
I’m not necessarily advocating for a federal FOSS agreement but it strikes me
that if one the agencies that has been forward thinking and generating GOSS
code for public use as part of their strategy for nearly two decades under the
NOSA license and likely has released one of the oldest G
CLASSIFICATION: UNCLASSIFIED
I _really should_ refrain from starting an interesting discussion before going
away for a long weekend... I'll combine my remarks to all the good comments
I've seen into this post.
Thorsten, you're right that the US Government's (USG) position is that USG
works hav
Hello Karan,
>However, it creates an unlevel playing field; the same code has
>different protections depending on where it is in the world. In the
>US, the license may be considered to be null and void because the
>copyright clauses can't be enforced, but in the rest of the world that
>might not b
>
> From: Thorsten Glaser [t...@mirbsd.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 2:10 PM
> To: Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
> Cc: Tom Bereknyei; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: Wrapping OSI l
