> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss On
> Behalf Of Thorsten Glaser
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 3:44 PM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org; license-
> rev...@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] veto against Unlicence (was Re
Hi Tom,
>Ignoring the legal morass of complexity that is the Public Domain, do you
>honestly think there is any practical risk from honoring an extreme
>permissive license where the copyright holder effectively says "I disclaim
[…]
>I just don't see the copyright holder having any ground to stand
mc...@lexpan.law dixit:
>The second paragraph of Unlicense is a license, at least as much of a
It’s not:
|This is free and unencumbered software released into the public domain.
This is a voluntary relinquishing of copyright protection done by the
authors. (Whether this is valid in the country
