Re: [License-discuss] question re: open source language in LA County document

2018-07-11 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:13 AM, John Cowan wrote: > It looks okay to me. An analogue would be if Yoyodyne Software released > some code, with the provision that if you run it on Yoyodyne Computer boxes > you have to use Yoyodyne Maintenance on those boxes instead of Joe The > Plumber Computer

Re: [License-discuss] question re: open source language in LA County document

2018-06-27 Thread John Cowan
It looks okay to me. An analogue would be if Yoyodyne Software released some code, with the provision that if you run it on Yoyodyne Computer boxes you have to use Yoyodyne Maintenance on those boxes instead of Joe The Plumber Computer Maintenance. It doesn't seriously restrict anyone's freedom t

[License-discuss] question re: open source language in LA County document

2018-06-27 Thread Chris Jerdonek
Hi all, I have a question regarding some open source language in a document that Los Angeles County published recently. I'm not asking for legal advice, but just to get a better understanding as someone who is working in support of open source voting systems in the City and County of San Francisco