This thread is now closed.
Thanks,
Simon
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
Rick Moen dixit:
>Anyone's GitLab is also (IMVAO) grossly overengineered. From my own
Yes, and I’d also not touch Ruby. I’ve not mentioned this much
because it was growing OT (hence the Subject change).
>better-designed alternatives such as Gogs and Gitea.
*cough* sshd and gitweb, and a post-r
Quoting Pamela Chestek (pam...@chesteklegal.com):
> Not sure what any of this has to do with software licensing
Point taken, and course corrected.
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/ma
Not sure what any of this has to do with software licensing
Pam
Pamela S. Chestek
Chestek Legal
PO Box 2492
Raleigh, NC 27602
919-800-8033
pam...@chesteklegal.com
www.chesteklegal.com
On 6/11/2019 3:01 PM, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Bruce Perens via License-discuss
> (license-discuss@lists.
Quoting Bruce Perens via License-discuss (license-discuss@lists.opensource.org):
> You're a bit over the top, regarding Ruby on Rails. And if you are bothered
> by the performance or resource use, consider converting the code to Crystal.
Oh, I don't know about over the top. There's not a single
You're a bit over the top, regarding Ruby on Rails. And if you are bothered
by the performance or resource use, consider converting the code to Crystal.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 23:45 Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de):
>
> > I will not use the Debian-provided Gitlab even f
Quoting Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de):
> I will not use the Debian-provided Gitlab even for Debian packages
> if I can avoid it, both because I’m
> by their badly coordinated move and because of its proprietaryness.
Anyone's GitLab is also (IMVAO) grossly overengineered. From my own
Operatio
We are getting rather far from the topic of license-discuss, aren't we?
Those who are interested in having a non-profit hosting service and would
contribute time to specifying what such a thing should do, and how, please
contact me off of the list. Or forever hold your peace, 'cause I'm going to
ma
John Cowan dixit:
>A basically volunteer agency like OSI "self-hosts" when someone
>volunteers to host for them. When that volunteer loses interest, the
>"self-hosting" goes away.
OK, good point. I was thinking of individuals, or a bunch of
like-minded individuals (but still defined by them inste
Quoting John Cowan (co...@ccil.org):
> A basically volunteer agency like OSI "self-hosts" when someone volunteers
> to host for them. When that volunteer loses interest, the "self-hosting"
> goes away.
Failover is a thing, isn't it?
Let me tell you a story. I'm a longtime volunteer with a loca
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 4:36 PM Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> … but it certainly is another service that can change or go away
> in a jiffie, and those who prefer to not be dependent on such
> things do well to self-host.
>
A basically volunteer agency like OSI "self-hosts" when someone volunteers
t
(restored natural reading order, http://deb.li/quote for details)
Bruce Perens via License-discuss dixit:
>On Mon, Jun 10, 2019, 12:14 Christopher Sean Morrison via License-discuss <
>license-discuss@lists.opensource.org> wrote:
>>Rick Moen said:
>>>reference to self-hosting his code repo for i
12 matches
Mail list logo
