We are not your lawyer, and you really should have one. Everything you get
from this mailing list falls short of legal advice. Many of us are not
admitted to the bar, and even the ones who are are not contracted to advise
you.
That said, it looks to me like you are within clause 5, but in your pla
> On May 27, 2024, at 09:17, McCoy Smith wrote:
>
> FWIW, the current PHP license has some (IMHO) minor issues with drafting, and
> is non-reusable, and has an advertising clause (clause 6) which means it is
> generally not particularly useful for many users and is not reusable for
> other pro
FWIW, the current PHP license has some (IMHO) minor issues with
drafting, and is non-reusable, and has an advertising clause (clause 6)
which means it is generally not particularly useful for many users and
is not reusable for other projects. Switching to BSD-3-Clause therefore
seems like a goo
On May 18, 2024, at 19:21, Ben Ramsey wrote:
Hi, all!
Over the years, there have been a few discussions on this list
regarding the PHP license. Other parts of the open source community
(e.g., Debian) have had lengthy discussions and disagreements
regarding the license, as well. The TL;DR sentim
Hi, all!
Over the years, there have been a few discussions on this list regarding the
PHP license. Other parts of the open source community (e.g., Debian) have had
lengthy discussions and disagreements regarding the license, as well. The TL;DR
sentiment of all these discussions amounts to: chan
Hi, all!
Over the years, there have been a few discussions on this list regarding the
PHP license. Other parts of the open source community (e.g., Debian) have had
lengthy discussions and disagreements regarding the license, as well. The TL;DR
sentiment of all these discussions amounts to: chan
