Saturday, February 18, 2023 2:46 PM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] The ambiguous scope of the Apache License
> 2.0 patent grant
>
> WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary
> of any links or attachments,
On Thu, Feb 9, 2023, at 16:10, ygrex908 via License-discuss wrote:
> "where such license applies only to those patent claims licensable by
> such Contributor that are necessarily infringed by their Contribution(s)
> alone or by combination of their Contribution(s) with the Work to which
> such Cont
I think it's fair to say that patent grants in open-source licenses can
be roughly divided into two groups:
- narrowly-scoped (i.e. applies just to the contributed code, examples:
EPL, BSD+Patent)
- widely-scoped (applies to the whole program as it existed at the time
of the contibution, exam
