Bradley, thanks for sharing your personal experiences in this field. They
were interesting to read, especially the part where dogs eat the requests
for source code!
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 2:35 AM Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Sorry for reopening a thread from last week; I don't follow this list
> cl
Sorry for reopening a thread from last week; I don't follow this list
closely and only happened to discover while skimming today that a GPL
compliance issue was under discussion here.
I do have a few comments on the thread that are hopefully useful:
Scott Peterson wrote on Wednesday, 8 August:
>
Got it
Thanks Bruce.
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 6:17 AM Bruce Perens
wrote:
> Is this really unclear? If you didn't distribute source code with the
> binary, you need to make sure that it's kept available for three years
> after the last time you distributed a binary copy, or the last time that
> a
Is this really unclear? If you didn't distribute source code with the
binary, you need to make sure that it's kept available for three years
after the last time you distributed a binary copy, or the last time that
any of your business relationships such as dealers and distributors did. I
mention th
On 02/08/18 08:09, Thorbjørn Vynne wrote:
For an end-of-life commercial product that are using GPL based software,
can any one clarify if its a requirement to keep having making the
source available even though no more products are shipped or serviced.
Please explain what is not clear in the
Hi
For an end-of-life commercial product that are using GPL based software,
can any one clarify if its a requirement to keep having making the source
available even though no more products are shipped or serviced.
Thanks
Thorbjørn Vynne
___
License-discu
