Hi, Alec-san,
2024-1-29 18:52 Alec Bloss :
> 4. The Work is provided by the copyright holder(s) and contributor(s)
> without any warranty, either express or implied.
What rights does the "contributor" have in this clause?
In general, License is a permission granted by the copyright holder to
thir
Hi Alec,
You don't mention if you are a lawyer, or if you have used one.
It is kindest to the developers to give them a license that is the product
of a legal professional, because of the greater probability that it will
perform as expected when a judge interprets it, rather than letting the
deve
This isn't the first release of the
license, but it's the first release I plan to eventually submit for review,
which is why I omitted mentioning the previous releases. See my reply earlier
in this message for links to the prior versions.
On Jan 29 2024, at 1:39 pm, McCoy Smith wrot
A ha! I’m so used to everything being on review I just assumed….
From: Kevin P. Fleming
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:43 AM
To: mc...@lexpan.law; license-discuss@lists.opensource.org; 'Alec Bloss'
Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Request for Comment: Software and Developmen
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, at 14:39, McCoy Smith wrote:
> This one has various basic drafting problems, for example the conditions of
> the license grant are strangely articulated (there's a condition on the
> copyright grant, a separate condition on all the grants, and no equivalent
> condition to t
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss On
> Behalf Of Josh Berkus
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 11:13 AM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org; Alec Bloss
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Request for Comment: Software and
> Development
On 1/28/24 11:47, Alec Bloss wrote:
The Software and Development License was created to fill what
was perceived as a void in open-source licenses. The GPL licenses, while
great, can and have caused unnecessary incompatibilities with other open-
source licenses. On the other end, the BSD licenses,
Can you provide a link to SADL v 1.0 or 2.0 for reference?
-Nick
From: License-discuss On Behalf
Of Alec Bloss
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2024 11:47 AM
To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
Subject: [License-discuss] Request for Comment: Software and Development
License, version 3.0
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024, at 14:47, Alec Bloss wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wanted to ask for comments/input on a license that I've been working on,
> prior to considering sending it for an official review. It's aim is to be as
> widely compatible with other open-source licenses without some of the
> com
Hi all,
I wanted to ask for comments/input on a license that I've been working on,
prior to considering sending it for an official review. It's aim is to be as
widely compatible with other open-source licenses without some of the
compatibility issues of the GPL licenses or extra requirements of
10 matches
Mail list logo
