On 3/26/2020 11:01 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 3/26/20 7:48 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
>> If AAL is a candidate for removal, should *all* licenses which have that
>> sort of attribution requirement also be removed?
> If you know of other licenses we passed with badgeware requirements,
> please name
> On Mar 26, 2020, at 8:02 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> On 3/26/20 7:48 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
>> If AAL is a candidate for removal, should *all* licenses which have that
>> sort of attribution requirement also be removed?
>
> If you know of other licenses we passed with badgeware requirements,
On 3/26/20 7:48 PM, McCoy Smith wrote:
> If AAL is a candidate for removal, should *all* licenses which have that
> sort of attribution requirement also be removed?
If you know of other licenses we passed with badgeware requirements,
please name them. Because yes, they should all be candidates fo
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss On
> Behalf Of Richard Fontana
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2020 7:06 PM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] REMOVE AAL from list of approved licenses
>
> I'm somewhat curious
On 3/26/20 7:28 PM, Richard Fontana wrote:
> FWIW I disagree with the 2002 John Cowan wrt his assertion that the
> AAL is "essentially equivalent to the Old BSD license". The badgeware
> requirement in AAL applies whenever the program is launched and is a
> direct restriction on modification, which
For the curious, this would seem to be the original license submission:
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/2002-May/005308.html
with apparently only one (positive) comment, from John Cowan:
http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensourc
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:18 PM Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> All,
>
> A submitter to License-Review just pointed out that we actually approved
> this license back in 2002:
>
> https://opensource.org/licenses/AAL
>
> There is absolutely no question that the AAL would not meet our license
> requirements t
All,
A submitter to License-Review just pointed out that we actually approved
this license back in 2002:
https://opensource.org/licenses/AAL
There is absolutely no question that the AAL would not meet our license
requirements today. Both the badgeware requirements and the presumption
of single
