Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-04-08 Thread Josh Berkus
On 3/23/24 03:48, Shuji Sado wrote: To summarize the discussion so far, the Blue Oak license is not open source, at least not in Japan. It is possible for an author to exercise author's moral rights to stop third parties from modifying the program. Not a Japanese lawyer, so I can't assess wheth

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-22 Thread Shuji Sado
Hi, https://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2023-December/005452.html > • Lucas: “While attempting to be maximally permissive in as few words as > possible, the copyright license does not consider potentially non-licenseable > aspects of copyright such as moral

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Shuji Sado
David-san, thanks for the explanation. It seems that UK law is basically the same concept as EU. I have done some research on the laws of Asian countries and it seems that at least Korea has almost the same concept as Japan. Taiwan's copyright law is also similar. The moral rights of authors are d

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread David Woolley
On 14/03/2024 08:54, Shuji Sado wrote: Permission to reproduce, modify, and distribute This isn't safe, as some countries have more economic rights than this. E.g. I think, for the UK, one would need to add "Use" in relation to a computer program. You need to be a "lawful user before you can

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread David Woolley
On 14/03/2024 09:07, Shuji Sado wrote: "the author shall not exercise moral rights. I thought the reason behind the EU having moral rights was to create rights that could not be contracted out of. For example, noting that computer programs are exempt, the original author of a work (not done

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread David Woolley
On 14/03/2024 09:07, Shuji Sado wrote: ~~~ Japanese Copyright law Article 20(1) The author of a work has the right to preserve the integrity of that work and its title, and is not to be made to suffer any alteration, cut, or other modification thereto that is contrary to the author's intention.

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Shuji Sado
me: > Usually, in Japan, contracts related to intellectual property rights > always include a clause stating that "the author shall not exercise > moral rights. > Perhaps, "freedom of modification" can also be regarded as a > declaration and agreement that the author will not exercise his/her > mor

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Matija Šuklje
Dne četrtek, 14. marec 2024 ob 10:07:17 CET je Shuji Sado napisal(a): > This is apparently the part that differs from Slovenian law. > As shown in the article below, Japanese law recognizes the right of > identity preservation even for software. There are some exceptions, > but if the author thinks

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Bruce Perens via License-discuss
On the other hand, I don't understand why more people don't specifically mention them. It took literally 3 additional words the last time I tried. ___ The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Sour

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Bruce Perens via License-discuss
Louis Villa contributed this license and is a legal professional, although I don't believe that law practice is what he does for a living these days. He's easy to find online. I believe that he even had the cooperation of other lawyers in making this license, there was a blue oak organization for a

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Shuji Sado
Matija-san, thanks for the detailed explanation. > Typically that would be the right to _integrity_ (which could equate to > modification) – but at least under Slovenian law, this specific moral right > explicitly does not apply to software. This is apparently the part that differs from Slovenian

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-14 Thread Shuji Sado
Hi, I am concerned that BlueOak only specifies "infringe that contributor's copyright". Since copyright and moral rights are two different rights, I believe that in the case of BlueOak's clause, the right to exercise moral rights is reserved to the original right holder. This is only an interpreta

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-13 Thread Pamela Chestek
I'm curious why this particular license caught your attention. As far as I know, only the EUPL has an accommodation for moral rights. Wouldn't the same criticism hold true for all the other licenses too? Pam Pamela S. Chestek Chestek Legal 300 Fayetteville Street Unit 2492 Raleigh, NC 27602 +1

Re: [License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-13 Thread Matija Šuklje
Dne sreda, 13. marec 2024 ob 14:46:23 CET je Shuji Sado napisal(a): > Moral rights, however, cannot be transferred. […] > In other words, it seems to me that an author who releases software > under this license can stop users from distributing or modifying the > software at any time. In Slovenia,

[License-discuss] Question about Blue Oak License

2024-03-13 Thread Shuji Sado
Hi everyone. # For some reason my email to OSI arrives two days late, so my reply may be delayed. I have a question about the Blue Oak Model License. see https://opensource.org/license/blue-oak-model-license This license seems to be an easy-to-read and understandable license for corporate legal