Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

-discuss-boun...@lists.opensource.org] On Behalf Of Rick Moen Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 12:15 AM To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source" [EXTERNAL MESSAGE] Quoting B Galliart (bgal...@gmail.com): > A couple months ago, I eval

Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

At OW2 Con a few years ago, someone from the Talend company introduced in a talk the concept of "open core". And he explained the difference with "open source". This was really similar. [image: PrestaShop]

Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

Quoting B Galliart (bgal...@gmail.com): > A couple months ago, I evaluated Pritunl, the "Open Source Enterprise > Distributed OpenVPN and IPsec Server" [...] > (1) What advocacy information does the Open Source Initiative provide which > indicates it is possible to protect the commercial viabilit

Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:37 PM, B Galliart wrote: > (1) What advocacy information does the Open Source Initiative provide > which indicates it is possible to protect the commercial viability of a > product when honoring the Open Source Definition? > Such a thing is hardly necessary any more.

Re: [License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

B Galliart dixit: >but still wants to market their limited license code as Open Source, what It’s not Open Source. There actually *is* a term for what they are doing (providing source code access under non-free terms): “Shared Source” bye, //mirabilos -- I believe no one can invent an algorit

[License-discuss] Pritunl "open source"

A couple months ago, I evaluated Pritunl, the "Open Source Enterprise Distributed OpenVPN and IPsec Server" The primary web page is available here: https://pritunl.com/ The github project is available here: https://github.com/pritunl/pritunl The license is available here: https://github.com/prit