On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:43 AM Henrik Ingo
wrote:
Btw, one point I left out of my first email: While we all agree that
> the community-style, aka "multi-vendor" way of developing FOSS
> software is the ideal form of open source, I think it's also important
> to give these single vendor efforts t
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 3:35 PM Dirk Riehle wrote:
>
> On 02.01.20 15:30, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> > I wanted to make some general notes on the term and practice of
> > "dual-licensing". This is related to the ongoing review of the CAL license,
>
> Thanks for taking the plunge!
>
> In my book, dual lic
On 02.01.20 15:30, Henrik Ingo wrote:
> I wanted to make some general notes on the term and practice of
> "dual-licensing". This is related to the ongoing review of the CAL
license,
Thanks for taking the plunge!
In my book, dual licensing is an IP licensing strategy and open core is an
IP
modular
I'd only make one small change.
Centralizing copyright *licensing* in a single entity enables those
(and additional) business models. I haven't come across many instances
outside of the FSF where contributors are asked to assign their
copyrights to the single entity, generally they are only asked
I wanted to make some general notes on the term and practice of
"dual-licensing". This is related to the ongoing review of the CAL license,
but this is general enough that license-discuss seemed more appropriate.
Terminology: Nowadays I often see "dual licensing" used broadly,
essentially referrin
