On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 4:15 AM Henrik Ingo
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:06 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> * Henrik Ingo:
>>
>> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:22 PM Florian Weimer
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that
>> >> its copyleft ext
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:06 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Henrik Ingo:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:22 PM Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> >
> >> I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that
> >> its copyleft extensions have the same major problem as the AGPL.
> >
> > Note t
* Henrik Ingo:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:22 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that
>> its copyleft extensions have the same major problem as the AGPL.
>
> Note that the CAL specifically does not share this problem. It simply
> require
Behalf Of Florian Weimer
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:19 PM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: [License-discuss] Extending copyleft and out-of-the-box compliance
>
> I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that its
> copyleft
ots! /Larry
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss On
> Behalf Of Florian Weimer
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2020 1:19 PM
> To: license-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> Subject: [License-discuss] Extending copyleft and out-of-the-box compliance
>
> I was a bit sur
Hi Florian
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:22 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that
> its copyleft extensions have the same major problem as the AGPL.
>
>
Note that the CAL specifically does not share this problem. It simply
requires you to p
cense-discuss] Extending copyleft and out-of-the-box compliance
I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that its
copyleft extensions have the same major problem as the AGPL.
With that I do not mean the predominant use of the AGPL as a GPL variant for
open-core business models
Hi Florian,
The CAL does not share the issue you identify with regard to the AGPL and
GPLv1. You said:
With that I do not mean the predominant use of the AGPL as a GPL
> variant for open-core business models, but that the AGPL requires to
> provide source code access over the network even if the
I was a bit surprised to learn that the CAL was accepted, given that
its copyleft extensions have the same major problem as the AGPL.
With that I do not mean the predominant use of the AGPL as a GPL
variant for open-core business models, but that the AGPL requires to
provide source code access ove
