Quoting Michael Downey (mich...@downey.net):
[about whether a CDCK contract is entailed for public use of a
CDCK-hosted Discourse instance:]
> No, they are not. Only subject to whatever terms of service the
> application operator, e.g., OSI, wants to place.
>
> Just like no one is entering int
Hi there,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019, at 12:59, Rick Moen wrote:
> I appreciate your speaking, Kevin. I continue to be curious about
> whether users would be expected to enter a contractual relationship with
> Civilized Discourse Construction Kit, Inc. (CDCK), in order to participate.
No, they are not
Quoting Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de):
[GPLv2 Discourse codebase:]
> I’ve not looked at it, but many “open core” are not Free Software:
> they often reject patches that add features because they would
> reduce the “added value” of the commercial version, and some even
> strip comments or, wors
Rick Moen dixit:
>misadventure, etc., is inapt. Discourse the codebase _is_ a
>free-software tool.
I’ve not looked at it, but many “open core” are not Free Software:
they often reject patches that add features because they would
reduce the “added value” of the commercial version, and some even
s
Quoting Thorsten Glaser (t...@mirbsd.de):
> Rick Moen dixit:
>
> >I appreciate your speaking, Kevin. I continue to be curious about
> >whether users would be expected to enter a contractual relationship with
> [ any third party ]
> >in order to participate.
>
> +1
>
> This is something that oc
Rick Moen dixit:
>I appreciate your speaking, Kevin. I continue to be curious about
>whether users would be expected to enter a contractual relationship with
[ any third party ]
>in order to participate.
+1
This is something that occurs more and more, but a bad thing.
See also: http://mako.cc/w
Quoting Kevin P. Fleming (kevin+...@km6g.us):
> I have quite a bit of experience in this area and can state that none
> of this would be necessary (and some are not even options). CDCK does
> not request or hold rights to any content on the Discourse sites they
> host. I have no doubt they would h
On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 6:29 AM Rick Moen wrote:
> For clarification, are you talking about an arrangement where users
> would be required to enter a contractual relationship with Civilized
> Discourse Construction Kit, Inc. (CDCK aka 'discourse.org'), in order to
> participate in a Discourse for
