ne.
I understood that the focus is on the issue of the imbalance of
interests between Big Tech and small communities, but it also seemed
like a problem that cannot be solved by any single technology or idea.
Personally, I believe we have to steadily promote a free and fair
system in every aspect, ste
; necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the
> Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discu
possible for an author to
exercise author's moral rights to stop third parties from modifying
the program.
I think license-review ml is for approval review, not for removal
from the list...
---
Shuji Sado
Chairman, Open Source Group Japan
https://opensource.jp/
https://shujisado.com/
2024/03
s are defined
separately from copyright as property rights, and those rights are
non-transferable, and furthermore, the right of identity preservation
includes Software Works as well.
---
Shuji Sado
2024/03/14 23:29 David Woolley :
>
> On 14/03/2024 09:07, Shuji Sado wrote:
> > ~~~ J
r
infringement under applicable copyright law, except executing it on a
computer or modifying a private copy. Propagation includes copying,
distribution (with or without modification), making available to the
public, and in some countries other activities as well.
~~~
2024/03/14 18:07 Shuji Sado
is/her
moral rights.
2024/03/14 5:36 Matija Šuklje :
>
> Dne sreda, 13. marec 2024 ob 14:46:23 CET je Shuji Sado napisal(a):
> > Moral rights, however, cannot be transferred.
> […]
> > In other words, it seems to me that an author who releases software
> > under this lice
der. This is only an
interpretation under Japanese law.
Perhaps, if the clause is "Permission to reproduce, modify, and
distribute", it could be interpreted that the right holder does not
suspend the permission by exercising his/her moral rights.
---
Shuji Sado
Chairman, Open Source Group Japan
ht
the software is licensed
for copying, distribution, and modification.
I am writing from a Japanese context, but perhaps there are similar
problems in other jurisdictions that recognize moral rights. I would
like to hear opinions here.
---
Shuji Sado
Chairman, Open Source Group Ja
ditions.
At least in Japan, such use of source code for machine learning is not
protected by copyright.
Probably the same in many jurisdictions.
However, this point of view may need to be discussed in the future.
---
Shuji Sado
Open Source Group Japan
> ___
AI will also end up relying on
Open Source software.
If we continue to speak out, there will be a time when they listen to
our arguments.
---
Shuji Sado
https://opensource.jp/
2023/11/1 10:51 Stefano Maffulli :
>
> We're off-topic but I don't want to leave this unaddressed
10 matches
Mail list logo
