If I'm not mistaken, MIT-0 would probably not be recommended for the same
reasons that the unlicense is not.
--Ryan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 9:48 PM Tobie Langel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The MIT-0 license[1] is an MIT license with the attribution clause
> removed. It has notably been used to license
tions of that part of the vim license.
-Ryan Birmingham
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 5:44 PM Kevin P. Fleming wrote:
> Hear hear! I recently had to grant an internal exception to allow
> contributions to Vim because "The Vim License" is not an OSI-approved
> license. I have no d
that break discrimination against fields of endeavor since
it may de facto bar use in secret applications?
I'm not personally interested in creating or using such a license, I'm just
curious.
-Ryan Birmingham
___
License-discuss mailing
