Re: [License-discuss] Open Source license question

ense. Your users will thank you for this. [1] https://github.com/caprover/caprover/issues/2036 [2] https://github.com/caprover/caprover/commit/ea1b06a1a6c1d6d153348572bb274bb22cd31b77 [3] https://github.com/caprover/caprover/blob/master/LICENSE [4] https://github.com/caprover/ca

Re: [License-discuss] stale link in license terms

g/web/20100617144451/http://www.osedu.org/licenses/ECL-2.0/ and the domain osedu.org was likely abandoned then taken over by a squatter circa 2015. Other URL to consider: https://opensource.org/license/ecl-2-0 -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne ___ The opinion

[License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE]: FOSDEM Fringe event on license compliance tooling on 2024-02-02

left. We're also always looking for sponsors to help fund the venue and catering - you can contribute online directly or email me directly at pombreda...@nexb.com I look forward to seeing you there. -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com AboutCode - Open

Re: [License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium

Dear Thorsten: Thorsten Glaser asked: > Philippe Ombredanne dixit: > > See > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UphruKKAlsoUEidPCwTF2LCcHFnQkvQCQ9luTXfDupw/edit#heading=h.p2d7mni4lrcu > > Why do you use Google services for OSS work? > https://mako.cc/writing/hill-fre

[License-discuss] [ANNOUNCE] Open source license compliance tooling meeting and hackathon on January 31st 2020 pre-FOSDEM fringe event in Bruxelles, Belgium

"register", just add you name to this document! (alternatively you can reply to me off list too) I look forward to seeing you there! -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne +1 650 799 0949 | pombreda...@nexb.com DejaCode - What's in your code?! - http://www.dejacode.com AboutCode - Op

Re: [License-discuss] Question regarding licensing

Cordially Philippe Ombredanne ___ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@lists.opensource.org http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org

Re: [License-discuss] popularity, usage, re-review of old licenses [was Re: Evolving the License Review process for OSI

lman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org > > One could probably do a pretty decent survey with some combination of > libraries.io, > clearlydefined.io, and Debian/Fedora (for C/C++, which aren't covered well by > libraries.io or AFAIK clearlydefined.io). Daniel German or Philippe Ombre

Re: [License-discuss] Oracle Java Mission Control (JMC) became open-source May 2018, I have some license questions.

y problematic item to me: this is not a bona-fide open source license because of this clause: "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil." This is something both difficult to enforce and comply with and has been widely debated in the past when it was introduced. -- Cordially Phil