On 2018-11-22 09:11, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Meanwhile, Kyle Mitchell wrote:
> >> Software developers, including companies that develop software, have the
> >> right to license their own, original work on terms of their choice.
>
> The "right to choose the
On 2018-11-09 13:11, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote:
> Kyle Mitchell wrote at 11:28 (PST) on Thursday:
> > There are many loopholes in AGPLv3. I've taken to calling
> > two of them "API Loophole" and "Container Loophole".
>
> Calling these "loopholes
of use, alone (OSL) and with
modifications (AGPL).
OSL and AGPL licensees remain free to use the software for
the endeavors of business, the military, genetic research,
and so on. To use open licensing lingo, they aren't
_restricted_ from using in t
HO.
Of potential interest:
https://web.archive.org/web/20180813181231/https://www.npmjs.com/policies/privacy#forgotten
--
Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
same vein, and
good history to know.
--
Kyle Mitchell, attorney // Oakland // (510) 712 - 0933
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
