kind of behavior. I don't know that I'd consider it non-FOSS.
And yes, I think one of the biggest risks of using this mechanism is
publicizing it so others use it to target marginalized people. That's why
I'm not recommending it or devising a license.
Eric
--
Eric Schult
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020, 8:02 AM Pamela Chestek
wrote:
>
> I don't see the point of these contortions. Why not just write a license
> that says "everyone case use the software except Amazon." It suspect it
> would be an enforceable license. Why are you trying to fit it under the
> umbrella of "open
s tactic, it should be well
vetted by a globally diverse set of people from marginalized communities.
--
Eric Schultz, Developer and FOSS Advocate
wwahammy.com
e...@wwahammy.com
@wwahammy
Pronouns: He/his/him
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discus
eciated that FOSS
> was collaboratively developed by people who had enormous disagreements
> with each other in other ways. Sometimes it seemed like a point of
> pride or fascination -- "sir, I detest what you say (or do), but I run
> your code and you run my code", to misquote a misquotation of V
t. Laws disarming honest citizens proclaim that the
> government
> is the master, not the servant, of the people.
> -- Jeff Snyder
>
> ___
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss@lists.opensource.org
>
> http
Rick: Are you finished sidelining what was a fruitful discussion?
I didn't talk about RMS and I'm not here to talk about sexual predators. I
didn't even think of RMS when I brought this topic up.
To most of the rest of the list:
I know most of you think Rick is out of line because I know you are
ly recommend a diverse set of marginalized people around the world be
consulted before moving forward.
Eric
--
Eric Schultz, Developer and FOSS Advocate
wwahammy.com
e...@wwahammy.com
@wwahammy
Pronouns: He/his/him
___
License-discuss mailing list
Lice
