Re: [License-discuss] Licenses for commercial products

2020-05-04 Thread Anton Shepelev
Russell Nelson: > Any open source license may be used with any commercial product. > We're fine with commerce. Go, make money off your open source > software. Just remember that the software is open source, and > anyone who receives your software must be free to sell it just as > you have sold it.

[License-discuss] Licenses for commercial products

2020-05-01 Thread Anton Shepelev
Hello, all May I ask a question in this mailing list about the interpretation of a license for a commercial product? Although it would be patently off-topic, I don't know of another place where one may seek help of people converstant in legalese. -- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mai

Re: [License-discuss] Fair license: does it require retention of copyright

2020-04-22 Thread Anton Shepelev
Pamela Chestek to Anton Shepelev: > > The Fair license is one of the shortest out there. It reads: > > > > > > > > > > > Usage of the works is permitted provided that this instrument > > > is retained with the works, so that any entity that use

[License-discuss] Fair license: does it require retention of copyright

2020-04-21 Thread Anton Shepelev
Hello, all The Fair license is one of the shortest out there. It reads: > > Usage of the works is permitted provided that this instrument is > retained with the works, so that any entity that uses the works is > notified of this instrument. > DISCLAIMER: THE WORKS ARE WITHOUT WARRANTY. Surpri

[License-discuss] Fair license: does it require retention of copyright

2020-04-21 Thread Anton Shepelev
Hello, all The Fair license is one of the shortest out there. It reads: > > Usage of the works is permitted provided that this instrument is > retained with the works, so that any entity that uses the works is > notified of this instrument. > DISCLAIMER: THE WORKS ARE WITHOUT WARRANTY. Surpri